If what the paper says is true she won't have any abusive memories. Not did she come over as a shrinking violet who shies from publicity -after all she took him to court twice.
I don't have to deal with.
Outstanding batsman as he was, he was also a very selfish one and so I don't think he's deserving of a knighthood. I'm no Boycott fan.
What do you mean If the paper says is true?
The court is true
No she didn’t Take him to court twice, he appealed that’s why she had to go through it again
You’ve seriously suggested that prosecuting a man for hitting his Lass is only done for publicity?
I’m not sure you can even see what you’re saying marra, victim blaming at its worst