• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

Takeover Rumours

Status
Not open for further replies.
How much did QPR, Wolves, Villa, Fulham, Poocastle spend?

Would Man City be the dominant force that they are without their owners?
You’ve kind of proved my point there. Thanks. QPR and Fulham particularly.
Chucking money at it mindlessly doesn’t guarantee anything.
Spending wisely and building something on sound foundations does.
Leicester, Southampton, Burnley, Bournemouth. Perhaps these are better examples to consider???
 

Are we git rich as owt yit or what?
Latest news: Everyone I've been talking to, or receiving messages from, have gone silent as from last night ... not so much as a snippette.

I'm taking this to mean that there's a period of intensity started and something will come out quickly.

Please bear in mind everything except the first sentence is speculation.

If there was a problem I reckon I'd have heard so I'm just as confident as I've always been :cool:
i can confirm that I’ve heard nothing either. So it must be happening.
 
You’ve kind of proved my point there. Thanks. QPR and Fulham particularly.
Chucking money at it mindlessly doesn’t guarantee anything.
Spending wisely and building something on sound foundations does.
Leicester, Southampton, Burnley, Bournemouth. Perhaps these are better examples to consider???

Forgot about LC. Didnt they spend relatively large amounts?
 
Jesus!! Must be about 70 new pages.. not sure whether this will end up Gerld or Parsnip... reading through I keep thinking Im getting a mix of about 30 different merged threads. :lol:
 
You’ve kind of proved my point there. Thanks. QPR and Fulham particularly.
Chucking money at it mindlessly doesn’t guarantee anything.
Spending wisely and building something on sound foundations does.
Leicester, Southampton, Burnley, Bournemouth. Perhaps these are better examples to consider???

Another good, recent example of how being rich can be dancing with the devil...

Man U signing Sanchez. At the time, City were also chasing. It made sense to break the bank to bring him in.

Fast forward 18months, he was on such a high wage that is sabotaged their own transfer activities. Apparently all of the players they spoke to all cited Sanchez's wage as the benchmark. "If he's earning that much and not playing, I should be paid £xxxxxxxx a week". Dybala tried to have their pants down.

One of the worst transfers in history and most fans were happy with it initially.
 
At the minute the club is operating below the bare minimum on every level. The first thing for me that needs doing with any investment is bringing in the staff to do the job. Scouts to cleaners. Employing the right people will have a knock on effect across the board.
been saying that for over four years mate...competent people from the bottom up..Scouting is a massive priority, the corporate also. The top level admin and PR staff, not people who are around although they may be capable will not be top of the tree, needed for when promotion to the championship is gained and high profile people from the manager, company solicitor to the company secretary who are capable and can manage at the highest level for when the situation arrives, top class footballing staff.
 
Anyone who doesn't think we are a big club are deranged tbh.
Big club in low league.
Just like man city were when they were here.
And just like City, mega rich owners have sat up and took notice.

Haway @Reiver man, get back in tha boardroom or the bogs an dee a bit more cleaning,
See if yer can pick up a few more snippets ;) :D
To be honest mate it’s an argument that can go on forever and has no definitive answer. We’re bigger than most but not as big as others is the way I like to look at it. With regards to this takeover, though, I stand by what I say; it isn’t going to be the big national news people think it is.

P. S A helicopter has just flown north over Sunderland.
 
Aye just pick a couple of random posts off a couple of random pages should tell you all you need to know how bad it is...

I agree with Wednesday but won't be jumping in front of any trains if it isn't...
Trains will be happy ;)

OK. .....this thread doing me nut in.
You must be a bit of an auld git then. Were you one of the Sunderland Arabs in the 80s/90s? The time when awaydays were mint.
Sure am. Though in truth I used to dress up a lot in flaired suits with national health gegs now and then.....just to look odd one out among them.

Those were the days.....late 80s as well if cast me mind back.
 
I really do hope we get a clear idea of what the new owners plans are when the takeover is confirmed. I assume they can’t go too overboard saying we will be the next City but it would be bloody brilliant if they did!
 
I appreciate the updates but i just cant understand how you say its done yet, ‘if there was a problem i reckon i would have heard’, How can there be if it is done as you say? :confused:

Sorry mate, I'm referring more about the announcement than anything else.

As I've maintained from the very beginning there's no going back on the takeover.

'Staffing issues' was the last real thing I was told, then it's gone quiet.
 
To be honest mate it’s an argument that can go on forever and has no definitive answer. We’re bigger than most but not as big as others is the way I like to look at it. With regards to this takeover, though, I stand by what I say; it isn’t going to be the big national news people think it is.

P. S A helicopter has just flown north over Sunderland.
did it look like this?
Logon or register to see this image

Cheeses may be able to 'shop SD onto the hat and insert appropriate SD image too
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top