Mackem00
Striker
Just keeping you right mate. Could just admit you were wrong/telling porkies like.
-
The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state with some features missing, normal posting/reading should now be possible.
Please read this thread for more details.
New user registrations are currently disabled.
Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.
Embleton and Baldwin could be off by Monday
- Thread starter Hawyatt Earp
- Start date
- Status
Sack_2021
Subs Bench
I just love it when someone is getting shredded over some stupid shit they've said and keep replying trying to move the goalposts to defend themselves. The first reply was a genuinely helpful response without any malicious intent, all he had to do was say "oh yeah my bad" and it would have been over. Now he's getting called a mag and apparently he's not bothered 
you have to be pretty unwashed to be not bothered by being called a mag!
you have to be pretty unwashed to be not bothered by being called a mag!
naughtynose
Striker
Embleton looked miles out of his depth against Oxford.
Embleton was out of contract he came back to sign what was on the table .He is behind mcguire,mcgeady,mcnulty,and o9 for that role
steve30000
Striker
Just get him banned..Oh great, this f***ing doyle is back
1more
Striker
As did the rest of the 11 that played that mate.
Well done for writing the lad off though.
naughtynose
Striker
Not writing him off at all.
Most of the rest of the players in that side have proved themselves already despite an off day, Embleton hasn't.
He may have asked for the loan for more game time till January? Or we may be moving him on because we have another player coming in...if that is the case then he would be better off on loan and getting games under his belt.
Personally, I'd keep him, he can get games in the cup and off the bench, it's a bit pointless to take away an attacking option that won't be on a big wage....unless someone is to come in of course.
Personally, I'd keep him, he can get games in the cup and off the bench, it's a bit pointless to take away an attacking option that won't be on a big wage....unless someone is to come in of course.
That implies the club held all the cards when that wasn't the case at all. The fact the contract offer wasn't revoked and he was allowed to continue training at the academy despite being out of contract clearly shows we were keen to keep hold of him.
It was Embleton's decision to let his contract expire despite being offered a new deal in May. Stewart Donald said himself that Embleton was seeking assurances over first-team football. Considering he eventually put pen to paper on a new two-year deal and rebuffed interest from elsewhere, Embleton was obviously told he'd feature this season.
That said, he still needs to earn his place like any other player, and I agree that at the minute we have better options in the starting XI.
1more
Striker
Embleton hasn't been given a chance too.
By all accounts he played well the other night
Gideon Gungeon
Striker
harsh to write off eli so soon imo mate
Reznor
Midfield
He hasn't been given a chance to since to be fair.
JERUDONG No.10
Striker
Should pay off Watmore. Injured again.
D
Deleted member 6830
Guest
Did he play OK?
Very sad.
Deserves some luck
Will be regular in the leasing. com run to Wembley
Last edited by a moderator:
But he had a decent game at Burnley. He's going to be inconsistent.
manamamackem
Striker
Honestly can't see Embleton doing one mate. Not after he signed a new contract, barely a couple of month back. Alright he was maybe sweet-talked into it by Ross with false promises of starting games, etc, but I reckon if he bides his time, he will get a chance due to injuries. Just my view of course!
- Status
