longers
Winger
Not for me
Just doesn’t sound correct for cricket
I am old school mind
-
The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state and are still being worked on.
Please read this thread for more details.
New user registrations are currently disabled.
David Gower
- Thread starter Scotty 1978
- Start date
- Status
Means jot all. Are Atherton and Hussain allowed to comment on bowling? Does that bother you when that happens. Quite often its those that haven't played who can speak the most sense
Shane Warne currently talking about batting. Didn’t get a test ton
You clearly didn’t see the clip, so you don’t understand the context.
Three lads who scored loads of hundreds for England in the studio, yet the question that was asked was about how Rory Burns would have felt at the moment he clinched his hundred.
The only person in the box who wouldn’t know what it feels like, was the one they asked.
So now you have the scenario, try to understand the context and let me know your thoughts on that.
Chappers
Striker
Same thing happend with that lass on the football asking what it felt like to be a 18 million pound player and what kind of pressure it put you under. She was asked the question and not Darren bent who was sitting next to her.
If the question was how would he have felt and Gower has went to her than Gower has fucked up and the lass has been put on the spot needlessly with the wrong question. Also in your original post you said she was the first to be asked to comment on it not how it would have felt.
Last edited:
Indeed, I was expecting most would’ve seen it.
In my intial post I commented how Gower was on the wind up - so that ones flown aimlessly over your head hasn’t it?!
Just give it a f***ing rest, eh?
You dont have come over as needless, aggressive bellend of a poster on here. A total f***ing whopper in fact
Ok pal.
Not keen on people trying to imply something that isn’t there thats all, sure you wouldn’t take too kindly to it either. You didn’t see the clip, didn’t understand the point and tried to, well, slander me basically.
I still think Gower was on the wind up and if he was I cannot blame him one iota.
Good efforts on the insults though
Voice of fair play
Striker
Ok pal.
Not keen on people trying to imply something that isn’t there thats all, sure you wouldn’t take too kindly to it either. You didn’t see the clip, didn’t understand the point and tried to, well, slander me basically.
I still think Gower was on the wind up and if he was I cannot blame him one iota.
Good efforts on the insults though
You don’t half come across as a male chauvinist old fashioned out of touch bloke on this thread
Just my opinion like!
Last edited:
Oh, here he comes, the voice of fuckwittery
Go on though, I’ll indulge you...... How is commenting on the actions of Gower, based on what I observed - chauvinistic?
Mind it’s nice to see you putting the ‘M’ word away for a short time like, suppose it’s nice to change things up from time to time eh?
Voice of fair play
Striker
You really do yourself no favours mind.
It’s clear as day to anyone reading your posts on any threads where women are concerned in cricket ,you have a clear preconceived bias against them and don’t want them anywhere near involved commenting on the men’s game.
It would best if you just admitted rather than pretending it’s just this particular women’s comments you find not to your liking.
No idea what the ‘m’ word is either totally lost on me.
It’s clear as day to anyone reading your posts on any threads where women are concerned in cricket ,you have a clear preconceived bias against them and don’t want them anywhere near involved commenting on the men’s game.
It would best if you just admitted rather than pretending it’s just this particular women’s comments you find not to your liking.
No idea what the ‘m’ word is either totally lost on me.
Last edited:
Did you avoid quoting me in the hope I wouldn’t see this response?
You can attempt to smear me all you want, some posts may be easier than others to tar me - but as I’ve said, I merely observed in this instance what David Gower had said and done. I haven’t once given my own personal view on the matter (except to accuse Gower of wummery) if you have a read back.
Don’t let that stop you peddling your agenda though.
You seem to have missed both the incident and the f***ing point - that is clear by the way you have responded.
Think hard enough and you’ll work it out.
I’ll ask you again though - How is commenting on David Gowers actions (that I observed) chauvinistic??
Last edited:
Voice of fair play
Striker
I am not getting drawn into a long term debate again, better things to do, it is clear to me and at least 3 other posters on this thread yout have a clear agenda against women been involved in men's cricket, that is based over a period of time.
You should be honest about it!
How is commenting on the actions of Gower, based on what I observed - chauvinistic?
I seriously doubt that. Based on your recent post history, it is ALL you want to do. You’ve gone out of your way lately to try and smear me. Perfect example here, trying to call me a chauvinist because I made an observation about the actions on television of a man.
Last edited:
Voice of fair play
Striker
I have not gone out of my way to smear you at all, you have had at least 3 other discussions with 3 other posters on just this thread alone about this subject, adding that to previous comments you have had about women commenting on men’s cricket it’s clear as day you don’t like it.
Refusing to admit that does you no favours at all.
The Breen Machine
Striker
Can we all just accept that Isa Guha is a massive wad?
She's infinitely better than the likes of Warne and Key too.
She's infinitely better than the likes of Warne and Key too.
Chappers
Striker
I'll give you point 1. But Iike warne.
For the THIRD time.
How is commenting on the actions of Gower, based on what I observed - chauvinistic?
Last edited:
- Status
