• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

Takeover in trouble

Status
Not open for further replies.

True enough, i guess we will find out the truth sooner or later.
We have had unprecedented access to the inner working of the club and its still not good enough.

There is a rabbit away and I don't believe for one minute it's not being led by people with an agenda.

We were a gnats cock away from not being in existence, trading insolvently and up to our eyes in debt, yet some on here want to dispute we weren't told the full truth.

I don't recall the glaziers being so honest when they bought man utd
 
I don't believe any of that tbh.

You don't have to, I just put the stuff up that people were referring to.

Of course they do...

Juan gave them a million for Grigg then said he was out and felt ripped off...aye, but he bunged them a swift million for nowt anyway!

The bloke who said he was out flew over to England in the middle of a massive political campaign just to keep up appearances at a club he’s bailed on...doesn’t seem likely.

There’s a journo who has the scoop but it hasn’t been published...anywhere?

Donald has no cash...how did he pass the fa test?

Some of it may be true but a lot of it looks fabricated to me.

Watmore and Oviedo being available isn’t news and if they didn’t accept offers over 2 mil for McLaughlin they’d be mad given the league we’re in.

Not disagreeing with any of your comments.

Interesting...

It is, hopefully it's all bullshit.
 
Last edited:
This could be anything , I don't think if it went to court it could be used in evidence , better info on other threads particularly the RAWA minutes which OP explains his understanding of the meeting -excellent interpretation .

On the assumption you haven't read a few posts of mine earlier - there was a few comments on this thread about different snippets of the comments on the post I copied. Some were on facebook some were on twitter, posters were asking where these comments were coming from so all I've done is copied the screenshots from a page on facebook so that posters can see where these comments are from. Not sure why you think it would be needed in court, posters asked for a link, I've provided it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top