• The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state and are still being worked on.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

Flat Earthers

Status
Not open for further replies.

Teed said:
See, that's where all that gravity falls to bit's for me, something as light as a bird, it should be a noticeable effect, you said yourself the moon pulls the water slightly, now even if it only pulled it an half an inch away from the surface, over a third of the globe, that would be an unbelievable weight to shift, so a bird should, in reality, struggle against the gravitational pull.
Click to expand...
Each water molecule only moves a tidy bit due to the moon and sun. These are not all pulled straight up away from the centre of the earth. Say the moon is overhead, the water molecules directly below will be pulled straight up, but 200 miles away to the east, water molecules are being pulled slightly up and slightly to the west, in the direction of the moon. 200 miles in the other direction, water is also being pulled slightly up and slightly to the east. This squeezes the water molecules in the middle (directly under the moon) from all sides. This, along with the slight upward pull in the middle, pushes the central water molecules higher.

Stick a sheet of paper on the table and gently push both ends together. Although you are not lifting it in the middle it will rise.

Although the effect of the moon's gravity on each individual water molecule is very small, it is the effect of billions upon billions of molecules pushing (or rather being pulled) slightly to the middle that makes the water rise for high tide. It is literally the very small multiplied by a huge amount that makes it noticeable.

To a bird, it is flying free in the air. While there will be a pull from the moon overhead, it might only raise the bird in level flight by a fraction of a millimeter. Because the bird has nothing squeezing it upwards too, it does not notice the effect. Technically there is the air around it influenced by the pull, but because the air is not very dense it has little effect.
 
DaveH said:
Each water molecule only moves a tidy bit due to the moon and sun. These are not all pulled straight up away from the centre of the earth. Say the moon is overhead, the water molecules directly below will be pulled straight up, but 200 miles away to the east, water molecules are being pulled slightly up and slightly to the west, in the direction of the moon. 200 miles in the other direction, water is also being pulled slightly up and slightly to the east. This squeezes the water molecules in the middle (directly under the moon) from all sides. This, along with the slight upward pull in the middle, pushes the central water molecules higher.

Stick a sheet of paper on the table and gently push both ends together. Although you are not lifting it in the middle it will rise.

Although the effect of the moon's gravity on each individual water molecule is very small, it is the effect of billions upon billions of molecules pushing (or rather being pulled) slightly to the middle that makes the water rise for high tide. It is literally the very small multiplied by a huge amount that makes it noticeable.

To a bird, it is flying free in the air. While there will be a pull from the moon overhead, it might only raise the bird in level flight by a fraction of a millimeter. Because the bird has nothing squeezing it upwards too, it does not notice the effect. Technically there is the air around it influenced by the pull, but because the air is not very dense it has little effect.
Click to expand...
Nah! Not having that like, if it happened like you described, the bird would black out, because the moons gravity would pull all it's blood into it's brain, I'm calling bullshit on this explanation mate.
 
Teed said:
Nah! Not having that like, if it happened like you described, the bird would black out, because the moons gravity would pull all it's blood into it's brain, I'm calling bullshit on this explanation mate.
Click to expand...
I’m really just one of THEM trying to brainwash you. I guess I have been rumbled.
 
DaveH said:
I’m really just one of THEM trying to brainwash you. I guess I have been rumbled.
Click to expand...
Only one law of gravity mate and it has to apply to everything, that's all I'm saying, I don't know what shape the earth is, flat, round or Tobelerone shaped and all the stuff NASA put out doesn't convince me, these are people that claim to have put men on the moon, in fact I watched a video the other night, where an astronaut from one of the Apollo flights didn't even know what the Van Allen belt was, claimed he went through it and it never had any effect, do you believe an astronaut wouldn't know what the Van Allen belt was, oh and they've managed to lose all the original data and footage from the first moon landing, probably down the couch, along with the technology that took them to the moon, how can anyone believe a word the fuckers say man.
 
Teed said:
Only one law of gravity mate and it has to apply to everything, that's all I'm saying, I don't know what shape the earth is, flat, round or Tobelerone shaped and all the stuff NASA put out doesn't convince me, these are people that claim to have put men on the moon, in fact I watched a video the other night, where an astronaut from one of the Apollo flights didn't even know what the Van Allen belt was, claimed he went through it and it never had any effect, do you believe an astronaut wouldn't know what the Van Allen belt was, oh and they've managed to lose all the original data and footage from the first moon landing, probably down the couch, along with the technology that took them to the moon, how can anyone believe a word the fuckers say man.
Click to expand...
NASA did invent gravity, so you probably have a point. Being the only ones who have ever operated in space means we only have to believe their word for essentially what they own. They even paid off independent nations (some rivals) to say they verified the moon landings. There is no limit to their mischief.
 
DaveH said:
NASA did invent gravity, so you probably have a point. Being the only ones who have ever operated in space means we only have to believe their word for essentially what they own. They even paid off independent nations (some rivals) to say they verified the moon landings. There is no limit to their mischief.
Click to expand...
Nobody invented gravity mate, it's just a theory, I'd believe NASA have operated in space if We had a photograph of the earth to prove it, rather than those CGI's they keep putting out, as to the moon landings,,, how did they get through the Van Allen belt?
 
dixonsafc said:
Funnily enough, cows milk has shit loads of mammalian estrogen in it which actually increase human estrogen levels. So if any milk was going to give you tits or ‘turn you gay’ because of estrogen, it would be cows milk.

The phytoestrogens in soy are actually though to have a positive affect and could help reduce the chances of prostate cancer developing.
Click to expand...
I read about this, but I thought it wasn't conclusive?
 
Teed said:
Nobody invented gravity mate, it's just a theory, I'd believe NASA have operated in space if We had a photograph of the earth to prove it, rather than those CGI's they keep putting out, as to the moon landings,,, how did they get through the Van Allen belt?
Click to expand...
There is a good chance in the next 10-20 years we will find out for sure. Either we can't get through the belts and humans are stuck on this planet for ever, or we can and could have done in the 1960s. With a number of nations and private companies looking at manned trips to asteroids, moon and mars there is a good chance we will once again see humans travel beyond low earth orbit.

Do you believe that all the other space agencies are faking it too, or just NASA?
 
DaveH said:
There is a good chance in the next 10-20 years we will find out for sure. Either we can't get through the belts and humans are stuck on this planet for ever, or we can and could have done in the 1960s. With a number of nations and private companies looking at manned trips to asteroids, moon and mars there is a good chance we will once again see humans travel beyond low earth orbit.

Do you believe that all the other space agencies are faking it too, or just NASA?
Click to expand...
Suspect he is just attention seeking.
 
DaveH said:
There is a good chance in the next 10-20 years we will find out for sure. Either we can't get through the belts and humans are stuck on this planet for ever, or we can and could have done in the 1960s. With a number of nations and private companies looking at manned trips to asteroids, moon and mars there is a good chance we will once again see humans travel beyond low earth orbit.

Do you believe that all the other space agencies are faking it too, or just NASA?
Click to expand...
I believe they are connected mate, the Banksters control this world and every nation apart from a few are in debt to them, so the puppet governments play the games they're told and keep in line.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Teed said:
Nobody invented gravity mate, it's just a theory, I'd believe NASA have operated in space if We had a photograph of the earth to prove it, rather than those CGI's they keep putting out, as to the moon landings,,, how did they get through the Van Allen belt?
Click to expand...

The van Allen belts are not so much of an issue unless you spend plenty of time in them (days for example).

The moon missions spent around an hour in them due to their trajectory and speed. As it happens, the amount of radiation they actually experienced was that of around two ct scans.
 
Last edited:
Still no actual evidence shown on here that the earth is the perfect globe we are supposed to believe, as is depicted in the NASA colouring ins that they release.

Need an SMB space force to venture out in to deep space and take some pics for proof.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top