keybuk
Midfield
I think this is the point at which he'll claim light bends.Have you actually ever run a laser over a lake or along a canal to check that?
You might be unpleasantly surprised.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think this is the point at which he'll claim light bends.Have you actually ever run a laser over a lake or along a canal to check that?
You might be unpleasantly surprised.
Surprisingly, given its name, Light is actually heavy. This is why it bends at the end due to the sheer weight of it.I think this is the point at which he'll claim light bends.
But here the light would be bending up. BUSTED.Surprisingly, given its name, Light is actually heavy. This is why it bends at the end due to the sheer weight of it.
I cant , just like you cant provide any evidence that water conforms to the exterior of objects , which is strange as 2/3 of the earth is covered in water
do you know all so called dinosaur bones in museums are just plastic replica`s
cause the earths flat and the atoms in the object are denser than the air around it so it drops
whether in a bath , lake , reservoir or ocean the surface is always flat and level . nowhere do we see water bend or curve - explain that on a spinning ball
I may not be able to spell but I aint so stupid to believe I live on a spinning ball that's 2/3 water
It has to, otherwise it would snap due to the weight.But here the light would be bending up. BUSTED.
Really? In other aspects of astronomy and observing they were quite a bit ahead of Europeans.It always surprised me that the Chinese were amongst the last to believe in a flat earth. That Christian missionaries were putting them right, right up until the 17th century.
Yeah. You'd think the connection would be ready to be made but it doesn't quite connect nevertheless.Really? In other aspects of astronomy and observing they were quite a bit ahead of Europeans.
They never developed glass, which means they didn't have lenses, so Europe overtook them.
Of course there are, you can go eastwards around it or westwards, but you'll still have gone about it both ways.It's definitely flat like nee two ways about it
The tropopauseSo you haven’t seen the photo of the swimmer where his head is above he surface but still covered in a film of water, or seen a meniscus form on a liquid, or seen one of those fancy wage features where the water runs down the outside of a ball of marble in an even manner then. Scale that up to a planetary scale and it isn’t really all that shocking
Apart from the real ones that is.
And what keeps the air from floating away into space?
The problem is though, once you start involving physics, the flatters have to deny it.So you haven’t seen the photo of the swimmer where his head is above he surface but still covered in a film of water, or seen a meniscus form on a liquid, or seen one of those fancy wage features where the water runs down the outside of a ball of marble in an even manner then. Scale that up to a planetary scale and it isn’t really all that shocking
Apart from the real ones that is.
And what keeps the air from floating away into space?
The problem is though, once you start involving physics, the flatters have to deny it.
So what how come I can sail round the globe following a compass?
Magnetism is a lie
Why does the water stick?
Gravity is a lie
How come the laser proves it’s curved?
Electromagnetic theory is a lie
What about the view form space?
Astronomy is a lie
The end result being that you have to deny all of physics, in which case how does any machine or building work? Why aren’t we still sitting in caves on our flat earth?
You're also told truths (or at least non-all fairy tales n BS , just remember your lied to from day yer born till the day you die
And the scale of the lie. How do they convince joe explorer, who’s just tried to row round the world only to bump into the wall of ice, to tell people he got all the way round?They're absolute idiots.
What I don't get is even if it was flat, what's the point of lying about it?
You're also told truths (or at least non-
lies - there's a distinction) every day, so what? That isn't in any way evidence or justification for you believing any ridiculous proposition going. How do you know the 'Flat Earth' isn't one of the lies?
What would falsify your belief? What would need to be shown to you, to convince you you're not correct?