• The forum upgrades are now largely complete.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

England v India 4th Test

Status
Not open for further replies.

Why is it though? He has faced the most number of balls this summer and is our top scorer

Take away any pre-conceived conceptions you have, he has batted the most responsibility, why can't he bat 5? Because he can also keep wicket?

Bairstow averages 40+ at 7, Buttler has been averaging 50 odd batting 6

Five is different to six... I just think it'll end up like Bairstow. He's a six or a seven. They all are tbh, that's the problem.
 
Cook, Jennings, Ali, Root, Bairstow, Stokes, Buttler (w), Woakes, Curran, Broad, Anderson

Play Stokes as a batsman only if his knee isn't up to it.
Maybe bring Pope back and rest Jimmy or Broad if Stokes is fit enough to bowl?

We may as well give Ali ago at 3 like, nothing to lose, he has batted there is whole county career

My team if fit is

Cook, Jennings, Ali, Root, Buttler, Stokes, Bairstow (w), Curran, Broad, Anderson, Leach

Five is different to six... I just think it'll end up like Bairstow. He's a six or a seven. They all are tbh, that's the problem.

I still think its a pre-conceived idea, he has faced the most balls in the team, and isn't batting like a 6 or 7, he is batting in the style of a top order player

If he goes back to 7 he will just start slogging again IMO
 
We may as well give Ali ago at 3 like, nothing to lose, he has batted there is whole county career

My team if fit is

Cook, Jennings, Ali, Root, Buttler, Stokes, Bairstow (w), Curran, Broad, Anderson, Leach

Not sure Stokes will play, he's not 100%. I'd bring Burns in too. And switch Buttler, Bairstow but let's not hog the thread with that!
 
This was in part my point to you about Buttler/Bairstow though. Buttler at five is a square peg, round hole.
Don't recall. But ….. in my thinking moving Buttler around in the middle order is a different kettle of fish to moving a middle order batsmen into the top order so I'd find that acceptable.

I don't mind an opener at 3 but I wouldn't like one at 4, 5, 6, 7

I didn't like Ali at 8 thinking that was too low for a middle order, but, he's been tremendous in that position.
 
Be great if Ali could get a TWM.

He's too loose for a number 3 though, and his weakness to short deliveries is a problem. Rather he focused on his bowling.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bri
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top