• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

New owner - Sun Report

Status
Not open for further replies.

janey said:
I didn’t, I don’t deny that, but I’ve seen that the Sun have changed their original story, and I’ve seen that lawyers are involved.
Click to expand...
Who has said that lawyers are involved and what does that mean?

A lawyer could be involved for all sorts of reasons.
 
The Rat said:
to be fair, there is fuck all else to talk about like

just imagine if your fatha dumped your mam and dated a stripper, I'd be mortified.
Click to expand...

I hope if that had ever happened I'd mind my own business like I'm doing now. Some people just feel the need to be holier than thou and it makes me laugh. :lol::lol::lol::lol:

janey said:
I didn’t, I don’t deny that, but I’ve seen that the Sun have changed their original story, and I’ve seen that lawyers are involved.


To be fair, you jumped in without reading later posts. So you were quite judgemental.
Click to expand...
Some puritanical posters on here today. Fancy judging somebody on a Sun article never mind the fact they've backtracked faster than an Italian tank
 
Uncle D said:
What do you think.
Click to expand...
Probably going for a gagging order as there is more to be revealed.

How would I know what it means? It's just a standard statement that people who are in uncomfortable positions with the media come out with.
 
janey said:
They retracted quite a bit of their original bile and replaced it with comments from his spokesman. I’m no apologist for blokes that do the dirty, but I’ll defend anyone that scum press do the dirty on.
Click to expand...
Well my comments are solely based on what I can read on the Sun web page. I can't see anything on there mentioning his spokesman. Just stuff saying he left his family when his youngest was 10 months old.

Of course there is one massive lie for all to see in that article. No way is that lass a make up artist looking at her face.
 
keybuk said:
Well my comments are solely based on what I can read on the Sun web page. I can't see anything on there mentioning his spokesman. Just stuff saying he left his family when his youngest was 10 months old.

Of course there is one massive lie for all to see in that article. No way is that lass a make up artist looking at her face.
Click to expand...
Well your your comments are based on what you want to see.
 
jonny gently said:
I hope if that had ever happened I'd mind my own business like I'm doing now. Some people just feel the need to be holier than thou and it makes me laugh. :lol::lol::lol::lol:


Some puritanical posters on here today. Fancy judging somebody on a Sun article never mind the fact they've backtracked faster than an Italian tank
Click to expand...
Not a French one?
 
janey said:
Fair enough, and yes. Stewart tweeted to say it was in the hands of his solicitor and the Sun changed it’s story to include Stewart’s spokesman’s comments.
Click to expand...
I thought you were looking at a different copy to me. I didn't see that the article continued. It doesn't really get any better for him as his spokesman has revealed he left his family when the bairn was six months old. Is the spokesman Rudy Giulliani?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top