• The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state and are still being worked on.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

How long can Rafa last?

Status
Not open for further replies.

samaistonsrightfoot said:
Aye but at least they were on topic. This is just page after page of adults calling each other names
Click to expand...

There's something a little strange about your 'contribution' on his thread.

You've said very little about Benitez, the thread topic, and your first three posts were bigging up Newcastle's chances at Chelsea.

That was followed by a couple of posts with sarcastic digs at Sunderland.

Now you're here complaining about the thread, that was started seriously, instead of just ignoring it or bringing it back 'on topic'.

You've not actually posted much, this year, with only around half a dozen posts ..... if you want better threads why not post some?

Your last thread was in collusion with a Mag who's posted on this thread ...... all a bit strange tbh.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Reiver said:
There's something a little strange about your 'contribution' on his thread.

You've said very little about Benitez, the thread topic, and your first three posts were bigging up Newcastle's chances at Chelsea.

That was followed by a couple of posts with sarcastic digs at Sunderland.

Now you're here complaining about the thread, that was started seriously, instead of just ignoring it or bringing it back 'on topic'.

You've not actually posted much, this year, with only around half a dozen posts ..... if you want better threads why not post some?

Your last thread was in collusion with a Mag who's posted on this thread ...... all a bit strange tbh.
Click to expand...

D.I. Riever solves another one ;)
 
Fetch Fletch said:
I'm giving him until January. He'll moan on and on about no transfers and make his position untenable with the board whilst cementing his second coming status with the great unwashed
Click to expand...

It reminds me of the MON saga who arrived as 'a lifelong Sunderland supporter' with huge goodwill.

Yet it's become obvious that he couldn't give a shit about Sunderland and probably never gives them a second thought.

Despite this the Mags appear to believe 'Rafa' will look back on the Toon above Valencia, Liverpool, Inter, Chelsea and Real Madrid.

He's a Spaniard who's managed Spanish clubs ..... but the Geordie Nation believe he's one of them.

It's f***ing hysterical the way these people go on.
 
Reiver said:
There's something a little strange about your 'contribution' on his thread.

You've said very little about Benitez, the thread topic, and your first three posts were bigging up Newcastle's chances at Chelsea.

That was followed by a couple of posts with sarcastic digs at Sunderland.

Now you're here complaining about the thread, that was started seriously, instead of just ignoring it or bringing it back 'on topic'.

You've not actually posted much, this year, with only around half a dozen posts ..... if you want better threads why not post some?

Your last thread was in collusion with a Mag who's posted on this thread ...... all a bit strange tbh.
Click to expand...

Eh? Half a dozen posts? There was probably that in the red and white army thread alone in response to yours when you were pulling everything about it apart.

Regarding being in collusion. Was that the thread I started to show how much Benitez has been talking out his backside, which pointed out factually how much money they’ve spent on assembling a side that’s now struggling in the prem, compared to other sides who have spent less and are performing well in the league? A thread designed to add substance to the notion that Benitez is performing poorly, should be doing better, and the excuses of having no money are false?

There’s about 7-8 pages on this thread of people telling other people they aren’t obsessed while calling each other names. I’m not singling anyone out. Both sides are as bad as each other in it. I don’t know why it hasn’t been parsnipped.
 
samaistonsrightfoot said:
Eh? Half a dozen posts? There was probably that in the red and white army thread alone in response to yours when you were pulling everything about it apart.

Regarding being in collusion. Was that the thread I started to show how much Benitez has been talking out his backside, which pointed out factually how much money they’ve spent on assembling a side that’s now struggling in the prem, compared to other sides who have spent less and are performing well in the league? A thread designed to add substance to the notion that Benitez is performing poorly, should be doing better, and the excuses of having no money are false?

There’s about 7-8 pages on this thread of people telling other people they aren’t obsessed while calling each other names. I’m not singling anyone out. Both sides are as bad as each other in it. I don’t know why it hasn’t been parsnipped.
Click to expand...

Sorry, I meant 'threads'.

My point remains ...... if you want better threads why not post more than 1 every 2 months or whatever?

Why should threads be parsnipped when it's just as easy to ignore them if they're not to your taste?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Reiver said:
Sorry, I meant 'threads'.

My point remains ...... if you want better threads why not post more than 1 every 2 months or whatever?

Why should threads be parsnipped when it's just as easy to ignore them if they're not to your taste?
Click to expand...

You don’t really seem to have a point tbh. I’ll start threads when I see fit and contribute to others that l’d like to which is what i assume every other poster does. I didn’t realise there was a qualifying number of threads you needed to make before you can point out the endless pages of posters calling each other names instead of debating the topic, or any topic.

Using your logic no thread should be parsnipped if it’s easier to ignore it, so we might as well just merge all the boards.
 
samaistonsrightfoot said:
You don’t really seem to have a point tbh. I’ll start threads when I see fit and contribute to others that l’d like to which is what i assume every other poster does. I didn’t realise there was a qualifying number of threads you needed to make before you can point out the endless pages of posters calling each other names instead of debating the topic, or any topic.

Using your logic no thread should be parsnipped if it’s easier to ignore it, so we might as well just merge all the boards.
Click to expand...

My point is very clear.

If you want 'better' threads, post better threads.

I don't care whether you ever post again but threads aren't here to please your particular tastes.

If you don't like them there are plenty of others.
 
Zig81 said:
Not the same Ian you absolute sad bastard, I’ve never heard of this Cusack character you refer to and wank over.

There’s many posters on here you referred to you as Ian but only you mention your pal who has apologised for this forum, idiot.
Click to expand...
:lol: right, right, it's a whole different Newcastle fan called Ian who edits a fanzine. Because there's a whole host of them...

Totally different Ian. Yep...

f***ing Hell man Zig, you're a grown man getting riled up about things on the internet.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top