• The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state and are still being worked on. Normal posting/reading should now be possible.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

Administration?

  • Thread starter Thread starter S3RGIO33
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.

We can get rid of him and Cattermole, O'Shea,Love etc if it happened and would not have to pay them a penny other than statutory redundancy ...save a fecking fortune.

Are you sure marra ? thought footballing debtors were golden ?
if we go bust I think Rodders and Catts inherit the stadium !
 
Are you sure marra ? thought footballing debtors were golden ?
if we go bust I think Rodders and Catts inherit the stadium !
They are an employeee of the Club..Should an Administrator wish to terminate staff contracts, who I believe I'm right in saying are in effect debtors of the club, while attempting to sell the Club as a going concern may terminate staff contracts with immediate effect in order to protect the business for any potential future sale. Its a few years since I was involved in a couple of administrations but those rules seem to still be the order of the day.
 
Villa fans.
If the ref had been man enough to send Utds Serb centre half of at Wembley in the 17th minute which even Ferguson admitted should've happened Villa would've probably won the LC and his time there would've been viewed differently. He'd been booked 30 secs earlier and the ref bottled it. It was about 20 yes from me and I've nivver seen so many relieved faces on the pitch as the Utd players were once they realised he wasn't getting a second yeller.
 
I didn't say another owner couldn't have come in. But they didn't. We are not in imminent threat of administration FFS.
I never said we were, I don’t know if we are or not, I’m just going off rumours. It’s just a difference of opinion. I agree with the majority here that Short can not be defended, he’s taking this club one way and it certainly isn’t up.
 
If the ref had been man enough to send Utds Serb centre half of at Wembley in the 17th minute which even Ferguson admitted should've happened Villa would've probably won the LC and his time there would've been viewed differently. He'd been booked 30 secs earlier and the ref bottled it. It was about 20 yes from me and I've nivver seen so many relieved faces on the pitch as the Utd players were once they realised he wasn't getting a second yeller.

That maybe the case, fine margins and all that but ultimately he walked out on them days from the start of the season (I think?) on a squad that was bloated with overpaid players.

Was his own worst enemy here, signing two very questionable characters for big money that didn't fit his system and the less said about Graham the better.

I've seen some negative football in my time, but his was far beyond anything I have seen before or since.
 
They are an employeee of the Club..Should an Administrator wish to terminate staff contracts, who I believe I'm right in saying are in effect debtors of the club, while attempting to sell the Club as a going concern may terminate staff contracts with immediate effect in order to protect the business for any potential future sale. Its a few years since I was involved in a couple of administrations but those rules seem to still be the order of the day.
Exactly what happened with Rangers - though in that case an attempt was made to TUPE employees to the new club and most of them said no thanks and pissed off
 
That maybe the case, fine margins and all that but ultimately he walked out on them days from the start of the season (I think?) on a squad that was bloated with overpaid players.

Was his own worst enemy here, signing two very questionable characters for big money that didn't fit his system and the less said about Graham the better.

I've seen some negative football in my time, but his was far beyond anything I have seen before or since.
Oh I agree he was awful here. I was ower the moon when we got him but the Graham signing soon had alarm bells ringing.
 
Exactly what happened with Rangers - though in that case an attempt was made to TUPE employees to the new club and most of them said no thanks and pissed off
I think Tupe would apply to the remaining staff if the business is sold wholesale ,lock stock and barrel.. in this hypothetical scenario the administrator could determine that they only need 20 or 30 personnel were required so any numbers over that could be issued with their notice with immediate effect in order to keep the business running for a few weeks to see if a buyer came in. As I say ,its a few years since I was last involved in this type of work.
 
I think Tupe would apply to the remaining staff if the business is sold wholesale ,lock stock and barrel.. in this hypothetical scenario the administrator could determine that they only need 20 or thirty personnel were required so any numbers over that could be issued with their notice with immediate f=effect in order to keep the business running for a few weeks to see if a buyer came in. As I say ,its afew years since I was last involved in this type of work.
Rings a bell actually, questions were asked in that case when players were kept on into the close season, indeed I recall at least one signing in the admin period
 
I never said we were, I don’t know if we are or not, I’m just going off rumours. It’s just a difference of opinion. I agree with the majority here that Short can not be defended, he’s taking this club one way and it certainly isn’t up.

Im not denying he has taken us down or arguing the case for him to stay, just making the point that the Short Out brigade weren't complaining when we were enjoying our longest ever run in the top flight.

He has got us into a lot of debt but administration is highly unlikely, despite the rumours.
 
Im not denying he has taken us down or arguing the case for him to stay, just making the point that the Short Out brigade weren't complaining when we were enjoying our longest ever run in the top flight.

He has got us into a lot of debt but administration is highly unlikely, despite the rumours.
Time will tell.
 
That maybe the case, fine margins and all that but ultimately he walked out on them days from the start of the season (I think?) on a squad that was bloated with overpaid players.

Was his own worst enemy here, signing two very questionable characters for big money that didn't fit his system and the less said about Graham the better.

I've seen some negative football in my time, but his was far beyond anything I have seen before or since.
Shut up man... Adam Johnson is one of the very best footballers to turn out for this club in years. Neebody in a million years could have foreseen how his career would come crashing to a halt, let alone Martin O'Neill.

And as for Fletcher, he played his best football here under O'Neill.
 
I think you may be mistaking me for someone who works at the Club. Try reading my post again and then explaining which part states that I work at the Club, which part you disagree with and why you disagree with it, rather than posting silly smilies.

We were in the Premier League for 10 years, 8 of which were under Short's ownership. We typically spent around £40m a year on players. £25-30m each summer and £10-15m in January was typical of our spending in the Premier League under Short.
So we have spent 10 years in the Premier League during the most lucrative period in TV money being pumped into the game. And what do we have to show for it under Short's tenure ? Not a pot to piss in !!!
Given the money that has been poured into the game from Sky it would be virtually impossible for any well run club to be on the brink of administration with spiralling debts.
Yet somehow, our owner has completely mis managed us to the point that those 10 years will be very quickly forgotten when we are scrambling about in League 1 trying to make ends meet.
The man is an incompetent buffoon who deserves no thanks, praise or credit for anything he has done whilst owner of our club. He is destroying us but by bit every day he remains here !!
 
Im not denying he has taken us down or arguing the case for him to stay, just making the point that the Short Out brigade weren't complaining when we were enjoying our longest ever run in the top flight.

He has got us into a lot of debt but administration is highly unlikely, despite the rumours.
I hope the rumours are just that, rumours, administration would be a different level of low for us.
 
All of it, as it's utter tosh.

Can you post a link to this magical 400M net spend that Short has bankrolled?
Still waiting for a link to this magical 40M per year that Short bankrolled.....Here you go, I'll help you billy bullshitter.



Show me one year which Short spent 40M?

Are you seriously saying that we spent 10 years in the prem and this was down to Short? Apart from a league cup run and a few derby wins, what other memorable moments were there in this illustrious decade that we should be grateful to Short for?

He wasn't even around when we got promoted last, he has just oversaw the slow destruction of our club including a relegation. So what exactly should we thankful for?

The interesting thing about those Soccerbase figures is that they bear no relationship to the additions to intangible assets in the accounts. The highest totals in any one year were £51.9m in 2010/11 (under Bruce) and £58.6m in 2012/13 (under O'Neill). Total expenditure under Short up to 2015/16 was about £247m; adding on Moyes estimated spend brings it up to about £285m. Getting at actual disposal numbers is harder (it has to be inferred from nbv of intangibles disposed of plus or minus profit or loss on sales), but I'd estimate it at about £110m up to 2015/16.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top