• The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state and are still being worked on. Normal posting/reading should now be possible.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

Administration?

  • Thread starter Thread starter S3RGIO33
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.

molthemackem said:
The club have an O/D facility.
Click to expand...

Which is not the subject of a charge. Sunderland Limited has one charge outstanding to SBC; SAFC has three - two to SBC, and one to Stifel Bank of New York. Any current account arrangement with Barclays is therefore unsecured, and they could not instigate any administration process.
 
Grumpy Old Man said:
Which is not the subject of a charge. Sunderland Limited has one charge outstanding to SBC; SAFC has three - two to SBC, and one to Stifel Bank of New York. Any current account arrangement with Barclays is therefore unsecured, and they could not instigate any administration process.
Click to expand...
The Charge by Barclays, New York i was looking at was discharged in September 2016...Its all immaterial anyway. Keep on digging there if you dont mind. I'm sure there's a lot of other interesting snippets about to be revealed.
 
Sykes The Pop Man said:
9 games in the Championship and everyone is almost suicidal. It would have been 9 years had it not been for Short.

Ok he's made mistakes and we are paying for it now but it's 10 years of Premier League football we wouldn't otherwise have had.

And to all those who say you'd rather have been in the Championship under a different owner, I didn't hear you complaint when we were spending £40m a year on players.
Click to expand...

:eek: WOW.

We wouldn't have had 10years of prem footy if it wasn't for Short? :oops:

£40M per year on players? :oops:

Remind me, what do you work as at the club?
 
ProfessionalMackem said:
:lol: I just find it hard to comprehend that some people can still defend Short like this dunce.
Click to expand...

people will defend, its a difference of opinion, the majority see the owner for what he is, if someone disagrees so what, he may well work for the club he may not in end, you will always get people disagreeing just for the hell of it
 
ProfessionalMackem said:
:eek: WOW.

We wouldn't have had 10years of prem footy if it wasn't for Short? :oops:

£40M per year on players? :oops:

Remind me, what do you work as at the club?
Click to expand...
I think you may be mistaking me for someone who works at the Club. Try reading my post again and then explaining which part states that I work at the Club, which part you disagree with and why you disagree with it, rather than posting silly smilies.

We were in the Premier League for 10 years, 8 of which were under Short's ownership. We typically spent around £40m a year on players. £25-30m each summer and £10-15m in January was typical of our spending in the Premier League under Short.
 
Sykes The Pop Man said:
I think you may be mistaking me for someone who works at the Club. Try reading my post again and then explaining which part states that I work at the Club, which part you disagree with and why you disagree with it, rather than posting silly smilies.

We were in the Premier League for 10 years, 8 of which were under Short's ownership. We typically spent around £40m a year on players. £25-30m each summer and £10-15m in January was typical of our spending in the Premier League under Short.
Click to expand...
You’ve spelt wasted wrong mate.
 
Sykes The Pop Man said:
I think you may be mistaking me for someone who works at the Club. Try reading my post again and then explaining which part states that I work at the Club, which part you disagree with and why you disagree with it, rather than posting silly smilies.

We were in the Premier League for 10 years, 8 of which were under Short's ownership. We typically spent around £40m a year on players. £25-30m each summer and £10-15m in January was typical of our spending in the Premier League under Short.
Click to expand...

All of it, as it's utter tosh.

Can you post a link to this magical 400M net spend that Short has bankrolled?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top