He wasn't. Not according to the judges. He was ahead with two of themno. he was well behind
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He wasn't. Not according to the judges. He was ahead with two of themno. he was well behind
Shocked at that. Had klitschko up by3Joshua was ahead on the cards it seems
Me tooShocked at that. Had klitschko up by3
no. he was well behind
No he wasn't
As are you. Charver.f***ing idiot you like
I understand that but I thought the exchange where it was stopped, Joshua was hitting him with glancing blows not the full hits that he'd just knocked him down with.
No he wasn't he was up on 2 and behind on the other.no. he was well behind
Not according to the people who matter
ThisWhat we have learned tonight is how good Tyson Fury is.
He wasn't. Not according to the judges. He was ahead with two of them
And for me. Never had any problem with them before, but SM was total shit.Take a bow. Saved me night. Sportsmania was shit.
Even if that were true, which I isn't, it doesn't matter one jot, he knocked him out.
I agree. But it was 1-2 rounds in it. And the first 4 were very closethats complete bollocks tbh if they have it marked like that