• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

Adam Johnson Trial Verdict

Status
Not open for further replies.
prehab26 said:
We do disagree. I think it's been accepted, nearly by everyone that information was provided to the CEO of our club on May 4th, linked to the severity of the case. It was ignored and he as allowed to play. I really, logically can not see how anyone can deny it.
Click to expand...
I,don't think it's been accepted by nearly everyone mind.
 

Daks said:
Refund her season ticket and tell her and her family to fuck off
Click to expand...
What a cracking bit of PR that would be, just to add on to the great PR Sunderland are currently getting. Daily Mail have deleted that article about her getting compensation, I can't find it anyway. It's most likely bullshit.
 
janey said:
He was yes, that's the date the officer under oath in evidence, said he'd gone to the club and said he had given an indication of the charges. But had given no more detail.
I know we disagree but, I still say there is a canny discrepancy between what the officer under oath said and the officer yesterday said. I also think it's strange that an officer felt the need or that the pillar of morality the BBC thought it necessary for the police officer to tottle off and make a comment at all.
Click to expand...
Well said.
 
Daks said:
So what do you want ? Are you a sunderland fan ?
Click to expand...

Of course I bloody am. I know loads of people on here, I am involved within the community and help loads out with Sunderland related matters.

I want the person who was privy to such information to accept they made a gross error in judgement to resign. That is exactly what I want. The allegations and information she has access to, should not have meant that I could or should have the opportunity to cheer a sex offender. Her, pathetic lack of judgement, meant that I did.

People may call that false outrag. I don't think it is, enough know me on here and what I stand for; it's totally unacceptable.
 
ollie c said:
It is pretty poor. Subscription cancelled.
Click to expand...

The Echo is building itself up for a legal attack imo.

If I was responsible for the club's legal affairs I'd be looking very carefully at this latest outburst.

"SAFC is refusing to answer a list of questions posed by the Echo about the club's handling of the Adam Johnson child sex court case."

Has the club 'refused' to answer or simply not jumped to the Echo's demands?

Inferring that the club has replied to the paper and refused to answer questions is something quite different.

Read more:
You must be logged on to see external links
 
prehab26 said:
Of course I bloody am. I know loads of people on here, I am involved within the community and help loads out with Sunderland related matters.

I want the person who was privy to such information to accept they made a gross error in judgement to resign. That is exactly what I want. The allegations and information she has access to, should not have meant that I could or should have the opportunity to cheer a sex offender. Her, pathetic lack of judgement, meant that I did.

People may call that false outage. I don't think it is, enough know me on here and what I stand for; it's totally unacceptable.
Click to expand...
One person going isn't enough. If you think that will solve it, you are mistaken.
 
ChrisAshley said:
What a cracking bit of PR that would be, just to add on to the great PR Sunderland are currently getting. Daily Mail have deleted that article about her getting compensation, I can't find it anyway. It's most likely bullshit.
Click to expand...

oooooo imagine the family asking for money ? They couldnt could they ? ...there own daughter .....in a car with a married man
 
prehab26 said:
Of course I bloody am. I know loads of people on here, I am involved within the community and help loads out with Sunderland related matters.

I want the person who was privy to such information to accept they made a gross error in judgement to resign. That is exactly what I want. The allegations and information she has access to, should not have meant that I could or should have the opportunity to cheer a sex offender. Her, pathetic lack of judgement, meant that I did.

People may call that false outrag. I don't think it is, enough know me on here and what I stand for; it's totally unacceptable.
Click to expand...

He wasn't a convicted sex offender ...... I don't think the police had even charged him before some of those games.

You were doing the same as me and cheering a man without a criminal record.
 
prehab26 said:
Fair enough???

Was he not arrested on March 2nd and this information is directly linked to that ?
Click to expand...

Yes, that what was said referring to that meeting on March 2nd. You said that

"I absolutely believe the Durham Police force when they say they met with Byrne on May 4th and allegations were discussed in detail. That's forgetting everything else that links to his being absolutely true."

Yet the meeting on May 4th was between Johnson, his dad, his Qc, and part of the time Byrne. I have found nothing anywhere on line that points to a meeting between Sunderland and the police on May 4th, yet somehow the police were able to discuss allegations in detail at a meeting that they weren't even at. Clever fuckers them cops like.

Like I said, I think you got yourself a bit confused with all the speculation that's going about. By all means have a pop if you think the club are in the wrong but at least get the basic f***ing facts correct first.
 
Maximus said:
Surely that's his job to explain to his 8 year old son why he removed the bairn's photograph and not Maggie Byrne's. She should write back telling the bairn to ask his daddy.
Click to expand...

I have an 8 year old. I just said AJ got drunk and did some very silly things so he's not setting a good example as a footballer. She was happy with that explanation. It never crossed my mind to get my picture in the paper.
 
mag in peace said:
Thought you wanted this thread dead? Its turned into a canny amount of unbelieveable shit. Some of the things people have said are f***ing disgusting.
Click to expand...
I do, but while I absolutely condemn what he did, I'm not going to not defend people who are being proved guilty until innocent without the same recourse as he was, In other words the club. I've never supported any of the comments you've alluded to, I wouldn't ever. Show me if I have and I'd honestly hold me hands up.
 
Reiver said:
He wasn't a convicted sex offender ...... I don't think the police had even charged him before some of those games.
Click to expand...

He was an alleged sex offender in which the club were told, by police without doubt on May 4th. That SHOULD have been enough for him to not appear again.

waste of time. It really is.
 
janey said:
I do, but while I absolutely condemn what he did, I'm not going to not defend people who are being proved guilty until innocent without the same recourse as he was, In other words the club. I've never supported any of the comments you've alluded to, I wouldn't ever. Show me if I have and I'd honestly hold me hands up.
Click to expand...
Janey, you don't have to account to him, man.
 
prehab26 said:
I am not too busy. I have literally replied to this same bullshit all f***ing thread! This is one incident. The interview! No one gives a fuck about it. No one is disputing the fact that the police didn't inform the club of the details from the INTERVIEW!

what about all other meetings, been well documented. Not going to go through it again. It's like your post is the stock reply to everything, when in reality it's nowt to do with the majority of allegations. It's pathetic, bordering on insane.
Click to expand...

Bordering on insane. That's a belter from one of the biggest fannies on the board.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top