Ale taster
Striker
We're second headline on BBC news at ten
The media want a sacrifice
Sorry mags
Not looking good is it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We're second headline on BBC news at ten
The media want a sacrifice
Sorry mags
How do you know she didn't give him a blow job?....she said she did he denied it. Just because he is found not guilty that does not mean he didn't commit the offence
Fuckin hell man. You are a fuckin pathetic twat aren't you.Show me it ?
How do you know she didn't give him a blow job?....she said she did he denied it. Just because he is found not guilty that does not mean he didn't commit the offence
That goes both ways, we'll find out at appeal time.How do you know she didn't give him a blow job?....she said she did he denied it. Just because he is found not guilty that does not mean he didn't commit the offence
I didn't include myself in that group......or you.In that case you were never
I'm well known on here Robert, I'm at every home game should you wish to discuss it any further.
A text saying he wanted to finger her ? show me it then.Fuckin hell man. You are a fuckin pathetic twat aren't you.
All the evidence has been given in court and Johnson admitted sending that text.
What the fuck are you doing trying to defend him ?
He text her saying he wanted to put his hands down her pants.![]()
I am, I'm also aware of the lies SHE told.
Still serious enough for us to sack himThe 2 charges he admitted would have probably resulted in a fine and community service.
The charge he was convicted of, oral sex with a child is looking like 5 year sentence. That's how the courts view the seriousness of the offences, I agree.
Shut up bozoNo need for the personal insults between people like.
Settle down man![]()
I don't know, what I do know is that I annoy him greatly and he seems to have an irrational hatred of smilies tooI know he did, and yet he's just had a go at @sidneyeric for throwing about personal insults, irony eh?
If the club didn't know what he had done, they would have said it. The statement would have been a paragraph.
Since he pleaded 'not guilty' for as long as possible, the good and proper thing to do would have been to suspend him until the conclusion of the trial. Even without the child safety concerns, you cannot have someone accused of noncing a young fan representing your organisation.
Instead, they played him to help save the club from relegation.
It's really that simple and it's absolutely disgusting. Byrne should resign and there needs to be an inquiry about who else was party to the decision. Sack the head of PR while you're at it.
Corroboration is almost exclusively a legal term ....... I've never seen it used on here, ever, in any other way.
This. I set out in another thread the sentencing guidelines for this offence. A suspended custodial sentence was the likely outcome but it could easily have been immediate custodial.1) The charges he admitted to would have got him a suspended sentence because the grooming aspect is taken so seriously
2) He wasn't convicted of oral sex with a child, he was acquitted of that, and done for digital penetration![]()
Wasn't what I asked was it. Have you shown yourself on here tough guy? Easy game handing our the personal insults isn't when your not wiling to show yourself on here. Bairns playground stuff