• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

Adam Johnson Trial Verdict

Status
Not open for further replies.
Given your loudmouth attention seeking on Jimmy Hill and Hillsborough threads it's fair to say your thd biggest attention seeking here. Never mind yoh reminding people about you extraordinary lifestyle down the years

Ah the oldest trick in the book.

Fail with the argument, fail to bring in back up so start to bring totally irrelevant threads ...... what next, calling me Riv :lol:

I'm talking about in general...

Besides, I'm not going to sit here and name people from the last few pages am I?

So you can't remember a single one ........ neither can I, perhaps you're just wrong.
 

If that's true the club should just stop all this right now by denying it. They chose not to.

Depends on whether you want to believe what a convicted sex offender who has been called a liar by the courts has to say about hings tbh. If you want to believe the testimony of a shady character like him, get yourself away.
 
Ah the oldest trick in the book.

Fail with the argument, fail to bring in back up so start bring totally irrelevant threads ...... what next, calling me Riv :lol:



So you can't remember a single one ........ neither can I, perhaps you're just wrong.
How can I be wrong when it's a matter of opinion? There seems to be more people getting angry in their defence of the club than the other ways round in my eyes.
 
Depends on whether you want to believe what a convicted sex offender who has been called a liar by the courts has to say about hings tbh. If you want to believe the testimony of a shady character like him, get yourself away.
What does that have to do with my post? If that's the case then why doesn't the club just come out and say this, say he's lying and that he never admitted the facts to them. Why have they chose to ignore that part?

If it was me or my business accused of that I would want to put the record straight. Maybe they want to be associated with the crime? I somehow doubt it...
 
Ah the oldest trick in the book.

Fail with the argument, fail to bring in back up so start to bring totally irrelevant threads ...... what next, calling me Riv :lol:



So you can't remember a single one ........ neither can I, perhaps you're just wrong.

You haven't got a 'argument' as your admitting it would be different depending on what club it involves ffs:lol:
 
Seems to be people defending the club and absolving them of any blame that seems to be shouting the loudest now.

Funny that, apparently it was only the other side who did that 24 hours ago.

agreed there.
 
If that's true the club should just stop all this right now by denying it. They chose not to.

"Are you saying you've now stopped hitting your wife?"

"No, I mean ........ yes."

Yeah, that would stop all the speculation wouldn't it?
 
You haven't got a 'argument' as your admitting it would be different depending on what club it involves ffs:lol:
Seriously? In a case like this it's a stupid stance to take.

"Are you saying you've now stopped hitting your wife?"

"No, I mean ........ yes."

Yeah, that would stop all the speculation wouldn't it?
It would certainly stop it compared to their complete ignorance to the allegation and questioning.
 
You haven't got a 'argument' as your admitting it would be different depending on what club it involves ffs

Yes, I've already said that a few times now ....... you're the one who's starting and losing arguments because you can't decide on which one's best :lol:
 
If you want to post an email to the club ........ why announce it on here?

If you can't see that's attention seeking you're in no position to trot out your amateur psychiatrist routine to me.

You've already tried amateur barrister and failed there :confused:

Because you asked the question 'what would the club respond to?'

The answer... wait for it... was the email I sent them... asking them the questions.

When there was a thread half a year ago, someone posted an email they sent to the BBC. Someone replied saying 'f***ing embarrassing man'... Your reply was: 'He wrote a letter man, probably an email in the time it took you to post ......... he didn't super-glue himself to the railings outside the building :lol: '

So in that case, let me get this straight, it was fine because it was an email which probably took the same amount of time as a post, but in this case it's attention seeking? On a side note, how is it attention seeking to copy an email, but not attention seeking to post boring and mundane tosh that nobody is interested in reading?

No need to try and do amateur psychiatrist with you mate, it's clear from a mile off you have a strange obsession with attention seeking. You've had 26 separate posts in this thread that have said 'attention seeking', you utter bore.
 
It's a golden opportunity to get rid of Mrs Byrne for some, simple as that.

If is proven that the club knew something and cynically chose to ignore it, I will not go back to watch the games..it is, after all, an SAFC organisation matter, the decision will have been endorsed by the club as an entity...getting rid of specific officers will not be enough for me. It's all about strength of conviction.

I, of course, respect those that don't see it that way.
He wasn't convicted at that point by a court and he probably had a large part in making sure we weren't relegated. I'm not going to blame the club either way.
 
"Are you saying you've now stopped hitting your wife?"

"No, I mean ........ yes."

Yeah, that would stop all the speculation wouldn't it?
"Are you saying you've now stopped hitting your wife?"
"I have never denied having a wife"

"That didn't answer my question"
"I will make no further comment"
 
Seriously? In a case like this it's a stupid stance to take.

No it's not, read what I've said.

It would certainly stop it compared to their complete ignorance to the allegation and questioning.

Not a chance in Hell, people want their turn to climb on the high horse.

Everyone from the Child Protection Society, who notoriously fail to protect children to the BBC who notoriously fail to protect children.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top