• The forum upgrades are now largely complete.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

This'll be the Torygrapgh barred in Liverpool

Status
Not open for further replies.
Have we decided how much is the right amount to remember yet? Hillsborough is too much and makes you a set of candle waving victims. Heysel is too little and you're a set of murderous bastards.



Do you want every person who ever supported Liverpool to take responsibility for the action of others? Are the ones who got prison sentences not enough?
Maybe if a bit of compassion was shown from the pitiful city that is Liverpool
 

Candle vigil at anfield today........has it taken 30 yrs to remember what happened and who caused it?
It's very strange how quiet they are on this matter compared to hillsbrough.
 
Great article. Phil Neal is an absolute arsehole and many representatives of Liverpool, even Kennedy in the article refuse to blame Liverpool fans for what happened and they were to blame. That said I hate it when people make a correlation between Heysel and Hillsborough almost as if you can make sly digs at the latter because of the former. We have already had that with JFT39 type stuff on here.
 
I think it's fair to say that every person who ever supported Liverpool will say they were deeply affected by Hillsborough.
I felt partly responsible when Sunderland supporters, in the 70's, would sing 'he's a wog a wog' at visiting black players.
I suppose it's down to the individual, and their conscience how much responsibility they take.

No you didn't. :rolleyes::rolleyes:

The chanting and racial banter was de rigueur at the time. Just look at any 70's sit-com / comedians etc on TV. It was acceptable. Things didn't even start to change much until the early 80's
 
It's the same with the Bradford fire, that gets very little attention overall.

They sing justice for the 96, why not include the 39 people that died at Heysel? Justice for the 135.

The thing is, with Heysel, there was justice. People went to jail. English football clubs - and by extension, fans - were banned from European competition for five years. It's never going to bring 39 people back but there really is only so much that can be done from a 'justice' POV.

That's not to say it should be forgotten mind. Then again, the fact we are discussing it now would suggest it hasn't been...
 
No you didn't. :rolleyes::rolleyes:

The chanting and racial banter was de rigueur at the time. Just look at any 70's sit-com / comedians etc on TV. It was acceptable. Things didn't even start to change much until the early 80's

You're speaking for yourself, not me.

It was 'de rigueur' to call disabled people 'spackas' but I didn't do that either.
 
The thing is, with Heysel, there was justice. People went to jail. English football clubs - and by extension, fans - were banned from European competition for five years. It's never going to bring 39 people back but there really is only so much that can be done from a 'justice' POV.

That's not to say it should be forgotten mind. Then again, the fact we are discussing it now would suggest it hasn't been...
I guess the real mistake/tragedy was that the problem with overcrowded stadiums and unsafe stadiums wasn't addressed immediately. Hillsborough could have been prevented. It took a terrible tragedy for the whole thing to change, but it was the one in England that prompted real change.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Have we decided how much is the right amount to remember yet? Hillsborough is too much and makes you a set of candle waving victims. Heysel is too little and you're a set of murderous bastards.



Do you want every person who ever supported Liverpool to take responsibility for the action of others? Are the ones who got prison sentences not enough?

I can never understand this type of patter and also those that somehow feel resentful towards the scousers over Hillsborough and use Heysel as a weapon to whack them over the head with. Liverpool fans responsible at Heysel were an utter disgrace as were some of the players responses since then - however people really need to separate the two tragedies.
 
This is a damning legacy

"There are voices in Italy that go much further. Caremani, who has been sharply critical in his published work of Liverpool's limp-wristedness in the wake of Heysel, makes the incendiary contention that 96 deaths at Hillsborough could never have occurred if the lessons of 1985 had been properly absorbed. "From 1985 to 1989, the English were only angry about being banned from Europe," he says. "Heysel and Hillsborough had three important similarities: the disorganisation of the authorities, the behaviour of the police, and the fact that innocent people died. If the English had understood Heysel, Hillsborough today would only be the name of a stadium, not of a disaster."
 
I can still remember this well and I was only 12 at the time. Legging it home to watch the match and just watching complete carnage instead. At least there is an acknowledgement of the events at Heysel nowadays as at the time it seemed to get brushed under the carpet somewhat. Decent article in the gruniad about it all.

 
Pinched from the other thread but the Phil Neal comments in this article really do some him up as a person.

 
Pinched from the other thread but the Phil Neal comments in this article really do some him up as a person.


Hang your f***ing head in shame Phil Neal along with the rest of those Liverpool supporters that live in denial. Light a f***ing candle now!!!

Excuse Alert Mr Kennedy!!:

I am sure what happened was, in some way, related to events in Rome the previous year. Our supporters then were pelted with stones, bricks and bottles by Roma fans [and so there may have been tension between Liverpool supporters and the fans of Juventus, another Italian team].
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top