• The forum upgrades are now largely complete.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

BBC Johnson free to play for Sunderland

  • Thread starter Thread starter RTG
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
4 goals and 1 assist this season. 2 goals in defeats with the assist in September. He has done literally nothing since New Years Day.

I can't see how it's that much of a help in all honesty.

.....and all of which should be irrelevant.

Whatever the club has or hasn't done should not be based on anything to do with his ability / contribution to the team.
 

One thing that I think has failed to have been mentioned is the thoughts of his team mates on this and the opposition players on the field if he plays. There is obviously evidence and substance otherwise he wouldn't have been charged.
Him appearing on the field will result in torrents of abuse from opposition fans, Ill feeling of being on the same pitch from opposition players and possibly his own team mates

It's an awful decision from the club not to take him out of the spotlight while this is ongoing
 
I hope Advocaat is smart enough and place AJ on the bench.
The opposition players will try to get under his skin at every oppertunity and that might result in a red card for us.
 
wrong decision made by club.
What's a matter with people on here, what happened till innocent till proven guilty

One thing that I think has failed to have been mentioned is the thoughts of his team mates on this and the opposition players on the field if he plays. There is obviously evidence and substance otherwise he wouldn't have been charged.
Him appearing on the field will result in torrents of abuse from opposition fans, Ill feeling of being on the same pitch from opposition players and possibly his own team mates

It's an awful decision from the club not to take him out of the spotlight while this is ongoing
Are u stupid, why wud they mention what other players then think!!! F hes found guilty then yes sack him, if not then he will continue playin
 
I have not read this thread but for what it's worth I spent 40 years as a teacher...In that time over a dozen colleagues have had similar accusations against them and all have been found not guilty...However there was none of this innocent until proven guilty.All of them were suspended immediately, some for over two years. I don't know what to think about this situation...not very simple is it?

I find it strange that you cannot see the differences between suspending a teacher and a footballer in such a situation.
 
I find it strange that you cannot see the differences between suspending a teacher and a footballer in such a situation.
I can see the difference but don't accept this innocent until proven guilty is OK in some cases and not in others. Those I mentioned who were cleared were named instantly in the press and even many years later still have the "no smoke without fire" stigma.
Teachers are certainly in a position of responsibility and in instances like this need to be suspended. But I can remember a time when footballers were also expected to be responsible citizens. Should you not also suspend someone who could be considered a role model for youngsters??
 
I don't agree,
I don't care. He has been charged with a very serious crime and as such until it is all sorted I don't want him playing. You don't agree then so be it.
Innocent till proven guilty, by ur rules we should just sack anyone who gets accused of anything. If he gets found guilty then he will be in jail and sacked and rightly so, until then he shud be allowed to continue his job
 
I don't agree,
Innocent till proven guilty, by ur rules we should just sack anyone who gets accused of anything. If he gets found guilty then he will be in jail and sacked and rightly so, until then he shud be allowed to continue his job
Bollocks, he should be suspended pending the outcome. Ffs if guilty the outcome would be him classed no differently than a paedophile and on the register. Says it all really.
 
I don't agree,
Innocent till proven guilty, by ur rules we should just sack anyone who gets accused of anything. If he gets found guilty then he will be in jail and sacked and rightly so, until then he shud be allowed to continue his job
Where did i say sack..... Do youself a favour and take the time to read posts.

People going on as if he is jimmy savile. Embarrassing.

Bollocks.



Yeah, says the system is ridiculous.
Please do tell how it is ridiculous that if a grown man has sex with someone under the age of consent they are a pedophile and placed on the sex offender register?
 
Last edited:
I think the lad is a confidence player who needs everything to click into place for him to play well.

The moment this trouble came to light we might have well just have asked him to take the rest of the season off.

I'd give watmore a go on the wing and use Buckley as well at some stage if he's fully fit.

What our team lacks is hunger and these two players both have plenty to prove.
 
Where did i say sack..... Do youself a favour and take the time to read posts.


Please do tell how it is ridiculous that if a grown man has sex with someone under the age of consent they are a pedophile and placed on the sex offender register?
You don't even know what that word means.
 
"Jill Saward was the first rape victim in England to waive her legal right to anonymity and she has urged fans to boycott the Stadium of Light because of the decision."

Someone tell her we aren't mags. Idiot
youre an absolute disgrace of a man.

She spelt boycoutt wrong
youre not right in the head.

I sit next to a woman so I would be jealous
and again. complete fucktard.
 
He has the ability to win us a game with a single flash of inspiration and we need to win games. This isn't good news.

He hasn't done it anywhere near enough this season to suggest it will happen. He's as culpable as any of the rest of the useless pricks. Disappeared in most games.
 
It's pretty simple really, if you mess with someone underage you go on the register.

Yes, as I said, the system is ridiculous.

He hasn't done it anywhere near enough this season to suggest it will happen. He's as culpable as any of the rest of the useless pricks. Disappeared in most games.

Superb run, first touch, rounds keeper, scores. Linesman wrongly rules offside. We draw 0-0.

Where did i say sack..... Do youself a favour and take the time to read posts.


Please do tell how it is ridiculous that if a grown man has sex with someone under the age of consent they are a pedophile and placed on the sex offender register?

What if said man has no idea she is underage? And a bloke going with someone who is say 15 years old shouldn't bracketed with those who go with someone who is 15 months old.

If you say so.

Cant even spell it man :lol:
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top