We've had continued Premier League football for 8 seasons - which dates back to before Ellis Short's time anywhere near the football club - but it's been absolutely awful stuff for almost all of his time here. There has been no progression on the field under Ellis Short - we are worse than when he got here - and saddled with a lot more debt. I've been supporting SAFC for 40 years, and the last three seasons have been the most consistently dull, joyless football I have witnessed in that time. It hasn't even worked as a business model because we are still making a bloody loss.
He's tried setting up the club to be financially sustainable? You reckon that is a positive when he has completely failed to achieve that?
You're completely missing the point on managers. We have appointed experienced English managers with a track record of solid midtable Premier League finishes. We have appointed experienced managers with outstanding CVs, who have won stacks of trophies. We have appointed an Italian lunatic. We have appointed an up and coming coach. We have appointed an experienced manager who has won stacks of trophies, managed all over the world, and got to the Quarter Finals of the World Cup. And every one of them has failed. So at what point does the penny drop that the problem is not the managers, it runs far deeper than that - and Ellis Short, and his f***ing shite appointments, are the problem?
I've no idea who wants to buy a Premier League club, none at all. That's not my problem. I just know that Ellis Short has been terrible for this club - first of all wasting an opportunity to build on what we had, and now it's going to get far worse before it gets better when the basket case of a football team gets relegated, and then we'll see how committed to the club the Texan hedge fund billionaire with no connections to football or the area is.