J
johnson
Guest
Back in squad, replacing the injured Plunkett, I expect him to play.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Think Woakes will play myself
I think you might be right, I think Finn still has far more potential than him or Jordan though.
Same as the Sri Lanka decision. Stay in your ground is the solution.here is a scenario. finn runs in clips the bails off and the umpire signals no ball. the new law brought in. could england appeal for a run out and if the player was backing up, then the laws of the game, he has to walk. just in the spirit of sri lanka like
true. since they made it a no ball rather than a dead ball, i would have no problem if teams appealled for run outs thoughSame as the Sri Lanka decision. Stay in your ground is the solution.
Agree!true. since they made it a no ball rather than a dead ball, i would have no problem if teams appealled for run outs though
Fair enough if we were still playing Sri Lanka, I wouldn't try it against India unless Jadeja's getting a bit friskytrue. since they made it a no ball rather than a dead ball, i would have no problem if teams appealled for run outs though
its war now. theylike to play literally to the laws, so if were me, i would be looking al lthe time for an opportunity.Fair enough if we were still playing Sri Lanka, I wouldn't try it against India unless Jadeja's getting a bit frisky
Finn usually kicks the stumps rather than hit with his hand I thought? I think Stokes does it fairly often.
here is a scenario. finn runs in clips the bails off and the umpire signals no ball. the new law brought in. could england appeal for a run out and if the player was backing up, then the laws of the game, he has to walk. just in the spirit of sri lanka like
ththat would be a no ball, but you could not appeal for a run outDoes clipping the stumps with your knee constitute fairly putting down the wicket?
Why? Woakes bowled ok in the last test but didn't take any wickets, Stokes bowled better than Broad and Anderson in the game England lost and took wickets.Woakes deserves his place in front of Stokes to be fair.
Finn for Jordan is the obvious change, glad to see the big lad is back in form.
Rightly or wrongly England want their number 8 to score runs, and Stokes is a walking wicket. Don't think they fully trust Stokes' bowling either, England like containing bowlers and Stokes can go for runs at times.Why? Woakes bowled ok in the last test but didn't take any wickets, Stokes bowled better than Broad and Anderson in the game England lost and took wickets.
As the bails have been disturbed, he'd have to pull one of the stumps out the ground while still holding the ball. And since a no-ball can't be called until the ball has been released; this scenario is virtually impossible.ththat would be a no ball, but you could not appeal for a run out