• The forum upgrades are now largely complete.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

Women's cricket

Status
Not open for further replies.

brandon said:
I don't believe it would be anywhere near that standard. I reckon England Under 15's would comfortably beat England Women.
Click to expand...

England needed 10 from 10 balls to win and managed to lose by 4 runs. Couldn't seem to hit boundaries. Was awful to watch. Not as pleasing to the eye as the women either.
 
Looks poor on tv but I was very impressed with it at CLS brfore twenty20 last year.

They bowled quickly and hit the ball hard. Dont know whst peoplesproblem is with it. Watched quite a bit today on ecb tv. Enjoyed it
 
Greavsie said:
Looks poor on tv but I was very impressed with it at CLS brfore twenty20 last year.

They bowled quickly and hit the ball hard. Dont know whst peoplesproblem is with it. Watched quite a bit today on ecb tv. Enjoyed it
Click to expand...
They bowl at about 60-65mph. Most second team bowlers can get up to those giddy heights.

Like most (all) women's sports, it's absolute garbage.
 
Marko said:
England needed 10 from 10 balls to win and managed to lose by 4 runs. Couldn't seem to hit boundaries. Was awful to watch. Not as pleasing to the eye as the women either.
Click to expand...

Most of them are fat arsed lesbians with nee tits.......
 
Watching the fourth test highlights with my daughter and she turns to me and says, "Daddy, are girls allowed to play cricket". Girls are being conditioned into thinking they can't do sport because they might 'look silly'.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top