• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

Gordon

  • Thread starter Deleted member 4054
  • Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: Craig Gordon

if he does start today, is it a sign that he may be offered a new contract afterall... if not I don't see the point tbh
 

Re: Craig Gordon

KGC83 said:
No he isn't.
Click to expand...

He is like. I think Mig deserves the number 1 spot as he has earned it, have no reason to drop him. Westwood is massively over rated, only played about 5 games and made a few good saves but also some very poor keeping. I'd take Gordon over mig ability wise but Mig deserves the spot.
 
Re: Craig Gordon

Not sure how anyone can say gordon is the better keeper unless theyve seen all his reserve outings, lads been injured for the last few years more or less

obviously i hope he can still do the bis but theres no guarantee he is teh same keeper he was
 
Re: Craig Gordon

KGC83 said:
No he isn't.
Click to expand...

yes he is. The only doubt with him is not his keeper skills but can he keep fit?

Mig in a year or 2 if he keeps progressing will be a cracking keeper, not quite there yet.

I heard last night Gordon was starting but I thought it was just a whined up, maybe some truth after all ( still doubt it though )
 
Re: Craig Gordon

JKs canoe said:
if he does start today, is it a sign that he may be offered a new contract afterall... if not I don't see the point tbh
Click to expand...

or...

if he does start today, is it a sign that he might be prepared to accept a new contract after all... if not I don't see the point tbh


where's your evidence its the club dragging their heels???
 
Re: Craig Gordon

McMackem said:
or...

if he does start today, is it a sign that he might be prepared to accept a new contract after all... if not I don't see the point tbh


where's your evidence its the club dragging their heels???
Click to expand...

MON said they want to see him play before sorting a contract out.
 
Rip Van Fish said:
These rumours were doing the rounds a couple of yeras ago if I remember rightly.

Quinn was quick to dispel them by writing in the programme that no such clauses were in place.
Click to expand...

This.

People who talk about these clauses will happily slate CG as £9m wasted, so it's either we paid £9m or he hasn't hit clauses. Some people need to decide...
 
Re: Craig Gordon

McMackem said:
fairy muff.

given the initial cost - this should have been sorted out with an extension two years ago, or a sale.
Click to expand...

I remember Bruce saying they spoke about contracts but Gordon had a knee injury so try put it on hold.
 
Quillips said:
There have been rumours of 1m owed.

Yet just a few weeks back safc.com published an article saying he'd played 94 games (I think it was, maybe 93, sorry can't remember the exact figure, but it was a few below 100).

If there was such a clause it would be likely to be triggered by the 100th game, so he would have a small handful of games he could play. Some evidence to corroborate this theory would be his inclusion on the bench.
Click to expand...
so adding his wages to fee 200k + per appearance
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top