-
The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state with some features missing, normal posting/reading should now be possible.
Please read this thread for more details.
New user registrations are currently disabled.
Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.
England v India - 1st Test, Lords
- Thread starter Steak Pie
- Start date
- Status
You sure about that?
most definitely, you need to give them an incentive to go for the win
A
Andy Reids Love Chil
Guest
Only 325 ahead now
im a bit confused thats my point they should be 370 ahead
Charmless Man
Striker
I reckon we'll see them off for less than 300. Their bowlers have nothing on ours.
405 test wickets is more than Broad, Swann and Tremlett put together (without checking)
Charmless Man
Striker
405 test wickets is more than Broad, Swann and Tremlett put together (without checking)
Comparing him to Swann...
Harbhajan has played 96 matches to Swann's 32.
32 goes into 96 three times, multiply Swann's 140 wickets by 3? Comparatively it's more, not a great comparison I know and it is extrapolation but I honestly think Swann is the better bowler. He just hasn't played the same number of matches.
Edit - Swann's wickets have been less expensive as well...
Last edited:
aye but Swann spends his time playing on sub continent spinning wickets
H
hawes mackem
Guest
Another fifty for prior and broad looking good too, now time for a few big hits for half an hour then declare...
Steak Pie
Striker
we will never be number 1 in the world at this rate
Swing the bat, get up to a lead of 400 then get stuck in.
Another LBW that India would have got with DRS. What a shame
you could definitely be inline to replace Flower as coach
dangermows
Striker
knowing strauss we will bat the day out :roll:
nah in all seriousness i reckon he will wait til we have a lead of around 480 (which is about 80 too many in my opinion)
swann is much better, and bowls the majority on none spinning wickets (if you compare them to the spin friendly dust bowls harbi spends most of his time on).
nah in all seriousness i reckon he will wait til we have a lead of around 480 (which is about 80 too many in my opinion)
swann is much better, and bowls the majority on none spinning wickets (if you compare them to the spin friendly dust bowls harbi spends most of his time on).
how many sides in the history of the game have got 400...
this is rediculous, dangle a carrot to them, 360 is more than enough
I can't see that happening, I reckon that message then was to get a quick 20-30 runs and the declaration is on its way. Probably a case of Prior can get his ton provided he does it quickly.
- Status
