Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Me too. Was just going to defend the lad.The punctuation made me assume it was Gavin.
McCann is getting abuse...
Logon or register to see this image
Bet she bucks back though
Still wad
Until a story breaks that Gerry McCann sacrificed his daughter to mumm ra the ever living to gain mystical sexual hero powers.... I'm not interested, read to much already.
Not far off a working theory that like.
What a guilty conciseness looks like I'd imagine. Whether you believe in the bogey man or not, she and Gerry was at fault for the disappearance of their kid.
And then, they won't be?Until she is found dead or alive theyre still suspects in my opinion.
Still wad
So what you're saying is that Gyan was involved, right?Until a story breaks that Gerry McCann sacrificed his daughter to mumm ra the ever living to gain mystical sexual hero powers.... I'm not interested, read to much already.
I would say the person who took her is at fault. Kate and Gerry are victims. In this as well but in this country we love to blame victims.Not far off a working theory that like.
What a guilty conciseness looks like I'd imagine. Whether you believe in the bogey man or not, she and Gerry was at fault for the disappearance of their kid.
I would say the person who took her is at fault. Kate and Gerry are victims. In this as well but in this country we love to blame victims.
Until she is found dead or alive theyre still suspects in my opinion. Certainly guilty of child neglect at the very least
They did itMcCann's what?
It was tapas with wine but do exaggerate it into something else. The parents are victims what I said us correct.Maddie McCann is the victim. Parents who are victims usually look for their daughter the night they went missing, not sleeping off a boozy dinner.
Sky News making news up on a quiet day as usual.
Don't understand how Twitter works... but I thought for the person to see it you had to put the @ sign and their username for them to see it.
The wifey today from what I saw was typing stuff out and then putting the hash tag on followed by Mccann.
Doesn't that mean that they wouldn't even see the abuse unless they were searching for it? Or am I wrong in my understanding on how the sodding thing works.
No difference from the wifey doing that than her sitting in the pub saying it to a marra.
Twitter is for c*nts anyway.