Mags penalty...

[The Shepherd]

...WTAF?

Undoubtedly Schar was having his shirt pulled but was clearly offside, and would have been more so had his short not been pulled...VAR penalty

 

[Deleted member 55680]

...WTAF?

Undoubtedly Schar was having his shirt pulled but was clearly offside, and would have been more so had his short not been pulled...VAR penalty

Just seen a replay of It, was a free kick outside the box for me he starts pulling his shirt outside the box.

 

[Qwerty]

The argument is that Schar might not have been the player that touched the ball I think.
However the biggest culprit is the player who pulled the shirt yet nobody is criticising him

 

[dixonsafc]

Just seen a replay of It, was a free kick outside the box for me he starts pulling his shirt outside the box.

That’s not how the law works mind

If it starts outside and continues into the box, it’s a penalty

 

[Qwerty]

Just seen a replay of It, was a free kick outside the box for me he starts pulling his shirt outside the box.

Carried on inside so I think that counts. Similar thing happened in another PL game the other week.

 

[woodlebert]

Just seen a replay of It, was a free kick outside the box for me he starts pulling his shirt outside the box.

If a foul continues into the box I think it’s a penalty now

 

[Deleted member 55680]

That’s not how the law works mind

If it starts outside and continues into the box, it’s a penalty

Aye fair enough.

 

[herra soul mob]

is there not a Bournemouth player getting his shirt pulled in same incident ?

 

[Bladecat]

is there not a Bournemouth player getting his shirt pulled in same incident ?

To be fair Dancing Dan Burn was being pulled back more than once by an invisible claw as the Bournemouth players skinned him

 

[HettonSAFC]

If that’s a var pen then there should be 80 given every single game…

 

[Gobuchul]

It was a foul in the box but it was a soft penalty.

They often don't get given.

I didn't expect VAR to award it.

 

[Charles Eats Grass]

It was a foul in the box but it was a soft penalty.

They often don't get given.

I didn't expect VAR to award it.

Said as soon as Bournemouth scored yous would get a soft penalty very soon. Also said there’d be 10+ mins for yous to try and get a winner.

Very, very predictable.

 

[The Great MES]

Like I said on the mag thread every time they're struggling they seem to get a penalty and 10 minutes injury time every game.

 

[sofatester]

It was a foul in the box but it was a soft penalty.

They often don't get given.

I didn't expect VAR to award it.

Conspiracy still or have you lot realised yous were talking absolute shite as usual

 

[glendvd100]

Said as soon as Bournemouth scored yous would get a soft penalty very soon. Also said there’d be 10+ mins for yous to try and get a winner.

Very, very predictable.

It’s so weird, because even after the takeover they never used to get that. Then all of a sudden they had these talks with the fa about decisions not going their way a year or 2 back, and now it’s penalties and injury time every week. Wonder what the threat was they made?

 

[Qwerty]

Like I said on the mag thread every time they're struggling they seem to get a penalty and 10 minutes injury time every game.

Going off what I saw on MotD the 10 minutes injury time was as beneficial to Bournemouth as the mags.

 

[Daffy]

Mags get a soft penalty decision shocker

 

[errant]

its 'pelanty' man...

 

[Confucius]

So if he’s the recipient and he doesn’t foul him, he is offside? So how does “ not interfering with play”, come into it?

 

[Foreigner]