rentaghost
Striker
I think Stokes should be in the team as the (slight) deficiencies he may have with the bat are made up for tenfold with the ball. Also, as Rentaghost says, his rate can get you impetus.
My point was more to say that Id back, say, James Taylor ahead of him if I had to go for a bloke purely on runs at 6 rather than all round contribution to the team.
I'm not too sure mind. The step up to test match cricket is massive and Stokes looks quite at home there. I don't think there's any guarantee Taylor would and it seems a succession of different coaches have felt the same. I guess you never really know until you get that chance.