Alvarez to cost 10.5m euros

Status
Not open for further replies.
Might be a good thing, we are short of players and he has quality, trouble is he keeps getting injured. He didn't even have a decent run in the team.
 


Any official source for this one or is this just like the ones before with everyone blaming the club without any actual proof?
Source is gazetta who have rerun the same story they have run several times over the last few months
 
So, he's cost us a season-long loan fee, a year of wages and now 10.5m and he played 13 games for us. About a million per game, then!
Oh and we let him go for free because our hotshot board were convinced we wouldn't be liable for the transfer fee?

Don't forget to add what he gets in compo when he sues us......should be the thick end of €20m when it's all finished.

If nowt else it takes the "worst ever value for money signing" from Rodder's shoulders....:lol:
 
Who were recruited and employed by the owner.

To do that job so he wouldn't have to.

I know you're determined to blame Short completely no matter how small the problem because it suits, and the buck does stop with him. However there's plenty of blame to go around here, as usual.
 
How did u expect him to have a decent run in the side of he kept getting injured
What I'm getting at is he didn't have a chance, yes he got injured and yes he didn't have a run in the team.
 
If we pay the fee where does that leave his contract with us...do we owe him salary from the point of the formation of contract
 
Shambles.... a pattern here ... Alvrez and M'Villa, you cannot expect to give your word and sign a contract and expect to weasel out of it...its not acceptable ot professional.
 
To do that job so he wouldn't have to.

I know you're determined to blame Short completely no matter how small the problem because it suits, and the buck does stop with him. However there's plenty of blame to go around here, as usual.

He's the owner, of course the buck stops with him. Some seem to want to absolve him of all culpability for the utter shambles the club is.......it all starts at the top.

If we were poor in certain areas and not in others, or if once in a while an area of the club was changed for the better, you could say it's just down to individuals but across the board SAFC is a joke. There's only one person who is the common denominator in that.
 
He's the owner, of course the buck stops with him. Some seem to want to absolve him of all culpability for the utter shambles the club is.......it all starts at the top.

If we were poor in certain areas and not in others, or if once in a while an area of the club was changed for the better, you could say it's just down to individuals but across the board SAFC is a joke. There's only one person who is the common denominator in that.
The big test is now...these rumours if true ask big questions of short and the club
 
Embarrassing by the club yet again. Is it any wonder that we hardly have money to compete with the rest of the league when Short hires total clowns to run the club. The person/s who were involved in this transfer should be made to pay the club back out their own pocket even though they have already left the club and are now stealing a living from someone else. SHOCKING!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top