John J Rambo
Striker
Apart from sky are saying 9million PLUS add ons, so not the same deal.Sky are reporting the same figure tbf, just merely worded differently
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Apart from sky are saying 9million PLUS add ons, so not the same deal.Sky are reporting the same figure tbf, just merely worded differently
I think the club would be delighted if anyone wanted was to take Fletch or DG off our hands, problem is, up to now this does not seem to be happening. If we are honest aside from Defoe none are good enough and the first firm offer we have taken, in a bid to raise cash to strengthen a problem area.Having watched graham and fletcher last night. Wickham is messi. We should be trying to move this dead wood befor whickham. At least graham tries but fletcher was useless. Completely dominated by div 1 players.
When the likes of Ross McCormack and Jordan Rhodes can command a bigger total fee without even kicking a ball in the Premier League it looks like poor business
Is sow any good like?
Maybe nobody wants Graham or Fletcher.Strange one. On one hand, surely other options to sell first. Fletch or Graham?
However, is this going to be the year fletcher kicks on? Last year of contract so he is either gonna work hard to get a new one with is or work hard to put himself about. If so he may be a better option than Connor.
However, Connor hasn't exactly set the goal scoring charts alight and if between Dick and Lee they can bring someone in who can hit double figures, this is a significant improvement and would be deemed good business.
Apart from sky are saying 9million PLUS add ons, so not the same deal.
Yep, he scored 4 goals iirc. Remember how long it took Wickham to score 4 goals? lolDid you watch defoe last season?
I cant understand why people refuse to acknowledge he's only 22 as well. I can think of few young players getting goals at that age; Rooney and Owen perhaps. Even Shearer only got 4 goals in his corresponding season in terms of age. He's going to be a very good player.When the likes of Ross McCormack and Jordan Rhodes can command a bigger total fee without even kicking a ball in the Premier League it looks like poor business
I love my club mate but selling our best young striker while we still have fletcHer and graham is not a good move.Shhh man, there's another chance to have a go at the club carry on here. 9million plus add ons is a good deal and get 60k off the books, but most will believe the one that means they can have a moan.
Looking around the net and many neutrals think we've done exceptionally well to get that sort of fee.
Shouldnt that be "if you don't shoot you don't score?!"I was school captain, first choice striker and had a hell of a shot for a kid, but always listened to Mr Edwards the PE teacher.
"Rule number 1 ....... if you won't score DON'T shoot!"
Wickham needs a Mr Edwards.
We seem to be the only club who don't understand the value of home grown and potential.
Other clubs charge through the nose for such attributes.......even if the player has been average.
When we got 16m for Henderson some on here thought it was great business. Now he is Liverpool captain and an England regular......which was not hard to predict. We should have demanded the same as the mags did for Carroll.
@SkySports_Keith: Sky Sources: We understand the fee agreed between Palace and Sunderland for striker Connor Wickham is £9m including add-ons.Apart from sky are saying 9million PLUS add ons, so not the same deal.
If it means we can fund a top central midfielder then so be it. Would have preferred Fletcher or Graham to leave.Thoughts rockers on a serious note?