mackembhoy
Striker
Will be undisclosed so we'll never know.
Wickham to Palace
- Thread starter Antidotes
- Start date
- Status
redarmy 147
Goalkeeper
They should owe us money Imo.
Billy ballbag
Full Back
How do you know it's 6 mill like. What about the 9 that sky's saying. Or the 15 other people been saying. Just pick the lowest and twist.£6m
f***ing nice once congers mate, no better than f***ing Di Fanti
Gloopy20141
Winger
Tidied marra
Mowgli
Striker
Manager will be involved too£6m
f***ing nice once congers mate, no better than f***ing Di Fanti
Chucky Puddin
Winger
We'll have made a few quid back in loan fees when he's been out at Leeds and Sheff Wed!
Ricci's Special Kebabs
Striker
Stop living in 2014.
GipseT
Striker
sure we could not that we will
but do think so with AdvocaatBurnopfield Mackem
Winger
He played so much on the wing because he was not good enough to play up front and about half a dozen of our managers thought the same. If we had a left winger last season he would hardly have featured.
Gideon Gungeon
Striker
lad'll get a engy call up imo mate. wetch
Mowgli
Striker
Sky are saying £9m including add ones. Same as the mirror.
£15m is idiots on here
Shangri La
Striker
Christ, this is such awful business.
£15m and you can see why the club may have been tempted.
£9m? and not all of it even up front? f***ing hell. He is our best striker. And what sticks in your throat more is the fact that he's young and English, yet worse players who fit the same criteria are being bandied about at £15m-£20m. It's f***ing bizarre.
Even worse is those rumoured to replace him; Toivonen? f***ing hell, anyone who thinks he is even an average player needs to stop watching football, he's wank and it'll be a guttering day if he signs. Sow? Yeah, he's scored goals, but his wages and fee will probably exceed Wickhams, and he's 29 ffs. I honestly don't understand why the club cannot see buying young is the obvious thing to do.
And why have we let him go ahead of Graham and Fletcher? Of course, they may well be unsellable because they're atrocious, but that doesn't mean thats an excuse to sell one of your better players. I honestly can't think of another club in this league who would do something like that.
£15m and you can see why the club may have been tempted.
£9m? and not all of it even up front? f***ing hell. He is our best striker. And what sticks in your throat more is the fact that he's young and English, yet worse players who fit the same criteria are being bandied about at £15m-£20m. It's f***ing bizarre.
Even worse is those rumoured to replace him; Toivonen? f***ing hell, anyone who thinks he is even an average player needs to stop watching football, he's wank and it'll be a guttering day if he signs. Sow? Yeah, he's scored goals, but his wages and fee will probably exceed Wickhams, and he's 29 ffs. I honestly don't understand why the club cannot see buying young is the obvious thing to do.
And why have we let him go ahead of Graham and Fletcher? Of course, they may well be unsellable because they're atrocious, but that doesn't mean thats an excuse to sell one of your better players. I honestly can't think of another club in this league who would do something like that.
Exactly
GiantHogweed
Striker
true dat.
ChrisAshley
Striker
And the Journo is a Palace fan too, yet some have took it as being the truth.
Liverpool Beachball
Striker
Sky's £9million figure includes add ons though so the initial fee could well be around that
vote quimby
Striker
If it's more than a million we have absolutely raped them.
Rickybilly
Striker
Shit bait - shit for brains
- Status
