Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
seems to me that Andy just takes more care of his images than Ayesane
probably right, but the results are no different at all.
fight fight fight fight
I tend to just get it right in camera.
Haven't seen many of your images so can't comment on that tbh. I only bought my 1st DSLR 2 years ago so am still developing as a photographer, but can guarantee that if you look around at the top togs in this and other areas that charge £2k per wedding that none of them do most of their editing in LR.
My aim is to be one of those guys and I will get there a lot quicker with my ethos than if I had yours... I dont mean that in an offence way, just it's a fact that I have to have that ethic if I want to be a top tog
a LR action, cropping, photoshop action, LR action, spot removal. Under a minute per image.
agreed, I hate it TBH but it is good as organising the images and TBH the NR, spot removal and lens tweaks are canny.
IMO top togs are about the image and composition, processing is secondary..
Here is a basic black and white work flow I built:
Logon or register to see this image
Logon or register to see this image
a LR action, cropping, photoshop action, LR action, spot removal. Under a minute per image.
IMO top togs are about the image and composition, processing is secondary..
here man, never mind layer masks and midtones, sort your focus out
Logon or register to see this image
I'd also disagree with this comment as the processing is just as important with top togs as the composition and image.
I have a few unbelievable togs saved in my favourites and can see their processing and how much time has been spent on each. I also worked along side a lady called Yvonne Catterson at a friend's wedding who shoots for loads of top mags and had recently done a shoot with Noel Gallagher.
I was chatting to her a few weeks after the wedding on facebook and she said "now I know why I don't shoot many weddings... the editing takes forever!" I then saw her pics and the amount of skin smoothing and other pro standard editing things she'd done was remarkable and really inspired me to do the same.
She's a top pro... better than I could ever be and she takes just as much time and effort to edit her pics as me... probably more so.!
aye the work flow purposely makes blacks black. It leaves an adjustment layer and i normally change the opacity to suit, but the top image the shadows on the eyes are quite harsh natively.
She'll be better at taking photos then editing them I'd bet.
Regardless of whether they are harsh in shot as opposed to due to editing its still something you could correct in Photoshop and if these were for clients it would be bad not do so IMO.
I've seen her pics... she's pretty amazing at both, you don't get to work with the likes of Noel Gallagher unless you are the full package
think this calls for a shop-off. I'll provide you both the same RAW file, you have one night to edit it then post on here, we'll judge who's is better.
could have told you that 3 pages back...i dont even know what we're arguing about. How boring are we man?
if you want to be pro you're going to have to take better photographs, not get better at editing average ones.
oh, and I edited that image to the client's exact liking.
think this calls for a shop-off. I'll provide you both the same RAW file, you have one night to edit it then post on here, we'll judge who's is better.
processing is just as important with top togs as the composition and image.