Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well, I mean, he was... But we keep being told by the IKN's on here that he was only a stop-gap ..
Did you have a meltdown last summer when we were linked to be talking to others behind his back?and not have his replacement already lined up to start pretty much the day after? F*cking berks.
They knew fine well they wanted rid of TM FFS. Loads of clubs do it I suppose, it’s just mad…![]()
We should not be surprised..this is SAFCOther clubs manage it mind.
Hopefully something happens today/tomorrow. But it does demonstrate a bit of a lack of preparedness.
We are deffo nee WatfordPresumably because it's not as easy as that. There are processes to go through once the previous manager goes.
They can't start discussing a vacancy until there's a vacancyand not have his replacement already lined up to start pretty much the day after? F*cking berks.
They knew fine well they wanted rid of TM FFS. Loads of clubs do it I suppose, it’s just mad…![]()
You mean like the Stoke City hierarchy?I think most would complain but be more confident that the hierarchy have been decisive and quick.
Imagine trying to convince a new manager you're loyal and will back him, whilst going behind the current managers back and looking for replacements before sacking him... Not an appealing lookand not have his replacement already lined up to start pretty much the day after?
Would have thought they would have said something along the lines of 'by mutual consent'.What if he wasn’t sacked
What if Mowbray went in asking for certain things and they’ve declined.
Then Mowbray said “let’s call it a day then”
Imagine trying to convince a new manager you're loyal and will back him, whilst going behind the current managers back and looking for replacements before sacking him... Not an appealing look
This, like this week sheff Utd appointed wilder 30 mins after they sacked heckingbottom.Imagine trying to convince a new manager you're loyal and will back him, whilst going behind the current managers back and looking for replacements before sacking him... Not an appealing look
Potter manWould have thought they would have said something along the lines of 'by mutual consent'.
TBH it is shocking that no appointment appears to be imminent. It looks like they wanted to get rid of TM and just were waiting for a few bad results to use as an excuse. Would have been more honest and sensible just to sack him before an international break if they were intent on a change, as long as they had some one waiting in the wings to try and get a seamless transition.
For me the obvious choice would be Graham Potter, someone who knows the English leagues.
You think that doesn't happen most of the time????