why everyone is angry at meghan markle

JonMc

Striker
I reckon she thought being a Royal would massively lift her profile (she’s a self centred actress when all’s said and done) but didn’t understand the obligations to serve and what the public expected.
Really? You think Harry who isn't exactly trustful of the media might have given her a warning? I don't see too much wrong in her at all.
 

My Boy Harry

Striker
Bloody hell, that's actually reasonable :eek:

New mum living away from home and learning to be a parent feels overwhelmed. The endless judgements and negative press can't help that process either.
She is a normal lass, from another country, and she is thrust into the British Royal Family. She is about as remote from this family as anyone could get. She is a fish out of water and probably cant get away from all the falseness and diamond tiaras. I love HMQ but no way would I want to be part of her dysfunctional family.

I can fully understand why this normal Amercian lass may not be taking to life with the Windsor's.

however the security implications in all of this shouldnt be overlooked. I doubt that the Queen and the British state will want an air to the throne potentially walking around The Bronx unsupervised.
Do they bring millions in?

If we were to strip the royals of titles tomorrow and dump them in flats in the Midlands where would the taxpayer lose money? Would the country really be fiscally worse off?
I'm not sure youve spent much time thinking this through....
 
Last edited:

My Boy Harry

Striker
No. Bunch of parasites the lot of them.
fortunately youre in a complete minority on this one. Other than your socialist cult that represents absolutely no one the rest of us are quite happy with a monarchy.
Feel free to enlighten me Harry.
TBF if you cant see that your solution of taking them out of buckingham Palace and simply putting them in a council house in West Bromwich isnt quite the end of the story I think I should probably let you research this one a bit more.
 
Last edited:

PeteFTM

Central Defender
Do they bring millions in?

If we were to strip the royals of titles tomorrow and dump them in flats in the Midlands where would the taxpayer lose money? Would the country really be fiscally worse off?
' Forbes also reports that the British monarchy "contributes nearly £1.8 billion ($2.4 billion) to the UK economy" annually, including £550 million ($720 million) in tourism '
 
TBF if you cant see that your solution of taking them out of buckingham Palace and simply putting them in a council house in West Bromwich isnt quite the end of the story I think I should probably let you research this one a bit more.
You can replace that with "orf with their heads" if you like. Would the country by fiscally worse for not having them?

I think there are benefits to the royals, I simply don't think the benefits primarily financial.
 

jacko100

Striker
Do they bring millions in?

If we were to strip the royals of titles tomorrow and dump them in flats in the Midlands where would the taxpayer lose money? Would the country really be fiscally worse off?
Sounds like a good reality show with a huge earning potential!
 

robbied1

Striker
Piers Morgan, complicite in the cover up of 9/11 whilst the editor of the mirror clearly has an agenda. He's licked a few arsed to get to where he is
 
' Forbes also reports that the British monarchy "contributes nearly £1.8 billion ($2.4 billion) to the UK economy" annually, including £550 million ($720 million) in tourism '
Most of that is do do with physical assets, not the royals themselves.

Much like how Versailles is the most visited historical asset in Europe despite France getting shot a couple hundred years ago.

How many more would come if they could have a dirty weekend while staying in a room Queen Victoria got banged all over?
 
Last edited:

Boz33

Winger
They're at risk, simple as.

If you or I find ourselves at risk of being targeted by lunatics or idealogues we'd get protection, and would understandably be fuming if the police said "get your hand in your pocket" when we give a chunk of our salary every month to pay for them. That's not the way the system works
So we protect them for the rest of their lives while they will undoubtedly will earn multiple millions? Plenty of people who are at risk fund their own security, or if they really are skint, tap the family, it’s not like they aren’t one of the wealthiest families in the world.
See this is what slightly irks me, they want to fuck off the family business which is their choice and good luck to them, but at the same time they no doubt want royal
protection officers gratis.
Once they have left they effectively become minor royals working in a commercial world for hefty fees, personally I think it only correct they provide for themselves.....after all didn’t they same themselves they wanted to be financially independent?
 
Getting less favourable headlines than Harry's noncing uncle. The press are fucking disgusting
Can you prove Andrew is a nonce? Or are you just making it up for the sake of it? One of my cousins is a child abuser, I still talk to him when we meet on family occasions. Does that make me one too?

I would bet good money that within your circle of work colleagues, friends and relatives there are some that get up to unsavoury activities. Should we tar you with the same brush?

Are ALL Sunderland football players nonces because one of them was convicted of being one? Does that mean ALL Sunderland fans are nonces because they support a nonce team?
 

PeteFTM

Central Defender
Most of that is do do with physical assets, not the royals themselves.

Much like how Versailles is the most visited historical asset in Europe despite France getting shot a couple hundred years ago.

How many more would come if they could have a dirty weekend while staying in a room Queen Victoria got banged all over?
I disagree, I think the Royals are the lure to the sites. I also imagine there's many tourists who love the fact that these sites are still being used by the Royals, adds to the excitement.
 

Top