Unbalanced Views
Winger
I dunno why they didn't just watch Survivors from 1975
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Maybe someone in the lab was selling the animals to the wet market after experiments. The guilt usually lies with greed and negligence rather than something more sinister.
Its China and the lab cleaner won't be a millionaire. Like I said its probably nothing sinisterWhich is still a breach of protocols I'd imagine, if it's after experiments you'd think that the process to dispose of what's left would be shit hot. I can't imagine the people working in these environments need to sell animals to markets for disposable income... that seems a bit far fetched imo.
Greed can be sinister.
There's nothing wrong with discussing it imo, unless the CCP have already taken over the world and they're compiling a potential list of dissidents for re-education
Its China and the lab cleaner won't be a millionaire. Like I said its probably nothing sinister
I just imagine corruption is rife over there and it wouldn't be unlikely. I don't imagine anyone believed a deadly virus would be spread. It may be that someone caught it in a lab and it may be it could have been from wild meat. China have fueled the conspiracy theorists because of their reaction to eventsHow much do you think could be made from selling what's left to market? Can't imagine it's enough to warrant risking this unless the payoff was worth it which imo would only be the case if the buyer knew what it was and had sinister intentions; rogue actor. If it was done by a lab cleaner it raises questions regarding protocol.
I have absolutely zero idea how stuff like this works but I'd imagine there is layer upon layer of protocol/security, even in China, although I'd agree they perhaps aren't/weren't of the same standard as some other facilities outside of China.
Like you say it all seems rather coincidental, and that's without considering the geopolitical tensions at the time.
I just imagine corruption is rife over there and it wouldn't be unlikely. I don't imagine anyone believed a deadly virus would be spread. It may be that someone caught it in a lab and it may be it could have been from wild meat. China have fueled the conspiracy theorists because of their reaction to events
The SMB medical experts on hereDinnar, who hasn’t ruled it out?
Aye anythings possible.It isn't just the "conspiracy theorists" they've fuelled though imo.
What if the US, knowing the threat China poses to them, had a double agent do it deliberately to sway opinion against them and that double agent posed as a lab cleaner?
I wouldn't say anything was impossible but that's just my opinion. Interesting times nonetheless.
Aye anythings possible.
The simple fact is Trump blamed China and mud sticks. China would gain nothing by shutting down the markets it relies on
And would probably have done even better if Western economies were boomingThe only major economy to have expanded during 2020.
With the way Trump was steering the trade war? Not entirely sure it would have. The CCP aren't bothered about short-term pain if there is long-term gain, that's been demonstrated since it's inception imo.And would probably have done even better if Western economies were booming
China is just flexing its muscles to see how far it can push. It couldn't get into a cold war situation as China and the West rely on each other economicallyWith the way Trump was steering the trade war? Not entirely sure it would have. The CCP aren't bothered about short-term pain if there is long-term gain, that's been demonstrated since it's inception imo.
The West is already at war with China it just hasn't gone hot imo, at the moment it's political, economic, psychological and perhaps even biological.
China is just flexing its muscles to see how far it can push. It couldn't get into a cold war situation as China and the West rely on each other economically
Its not that the "lab cleaner" is a jobsworth. Its the WHO who is incompetent and in the pocket of Karl Marx.Its China and the lab cleaner won't be a millionaire. Like I said its probably nothing sinister
The guilt lies with the people wanting to better their lives? Not the people wanting to weaponize the life experience?Maybe someone in the lab was selling the animals to the wet market after experiments. The guilt usually lies with greed and negligence rather than something more sinister.
From the aspect of an educated person on China... it has never known democracy, or anything like it.With the way Trump was steering the trade war? Not entirely sure it would have. The CCP aren't bothered about short-term pain if there is long-term gain, that's been demonstrated since it's inception imo.
The West is already at war with China it just hasn't gone hot imo, at the moment it's political, economic, psychological and perhaps even biological.
The 'guilt' in this scenario would be a matter of fact rather than one of morality. A starving man who steals a loaf of bread is still 'guilty' of theft, eventhough he is morally justified.The guilt lies with the people wanting to better their lives? Not the people wanting to weaponize the life experience?
Which is still a breach of protocols I'd imagine, if it's after experiments you'd think that the process to dispose of what's left would be shit hot. I can't imagine the people working in these environments need to sell animals to markets for disposable income...
Greed can be sinister.
There's nothing wrong with discussing it imo, unless the CCP have already taken over the world and they're compiling a potential list of dissidents for re-education
Here we go fellas not man made in a lab just African swine fever and the cull of pigs and a shortage of Pork
Deadly pig disease could have led to Covid spillover to humans, analysis suggests
African swine fever led to mass cull of pigs in China and may have increased human-virus contact as people looked for other meatwww.theguardian.com
Stealing from another man is moral? Why not ask for some bread? Isn't the fellow who owns the bread moral enough to be ASKED for some of his bread?The 'guilt' in this scenario would be a matter of fact rather than one of morality. A starving man who steals a loaf of bread is still 'guilty' of theft, eventhough he is morally justified.