Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Atmos is a complete con, they've saturated the market with standard 5.1 (or 7.1) systems (or more likely crappy soundbars) & so they have to invent another Standard to continue selling more systems. Until up/down channels are encoded they are just taking the piss.Would love to be able to have Dolby Atmos with down firing ceiling speakers
Whoosh? (or upside down house? )I have ceiling speakers, but they're not down firing. I don't think they are, anyway.
Whoosh? (or upside down house? )
top tip. Whatever size you plump for - get the next one up. you won't regret it.We've got a 36 inch HD in ours but it seems tiny. You can get decent 55 inch ones for around £800-£1k and I reckon its about time I got out the 1990s and moved into the present.
top tip. Whatever size you plump for - get the next one up. you won't regret it.
This is what happens.55". Looked massive for about ten minutes, then i wished i had gone bigger.
Whats the hand test?
3D here as well.
Anothe disagreeing with active being better than passive mind.
Watch the 3D on a 2016 OLED (passive) and you will change your mind!
I'm saying that based on older TVs but I have seen the newer ones. Are yours 4K TVs? Do they simply use a alternate pixel lines to produce a 1080p 3D picture whereas a 1080p TV produces a smaller resolution 3D picture?My LG oled c6 is 3D and was the reason I went with it over the b6 as I'm a massive 3D fan, If people saw how good 3D was on the LG oled range and if it was as good as this it probably wouldn't be dead.
I do disagree about active being better than passive though.
I tell it as it is.Whats the hand test?
God, you're a right ray of sunshine aren't you...
They do, mate, although I've only looked through a few of the neighbours' windows so far.Do the wanks get better with increasing telly size?
Yeah it's 4k, if I am correct I think it loses half of the vertical lines which makes it 1920 so full HD still in 3D.I'm saying that based on older TVs but I have seen the newer ones. Are yours 4K TVs? Do they simply use a alternate pixel lines to produce a 1080p 3D picture whereas a 1080p TV produces a smaller resolution 3D picture?
Ditched a Samsung 3d TV last Christmas and got a 3d projector. TV was good but the projector is out of this world. And it only cost £340.Am I the only one with a 3D TV? Mine is a Samsung 55" Active 3D (better than Passive) and was the top of range £2500 TV a few years back but I picked it up on Gumtree last year for £250 Even though it's now a dead technology, there's still plenty to watch on 3D from over the years and there's still some stuff being released.
I think it's class as I also got the Samsung 3D Bluray player with 5.1 Surround which is excellent sound quality as the rumble from the bass is deep enough. Watching stuff like Jurassic World/Avatar/Gravity was f***ing class (better at cinema of course) as you get 'immersed' in the picture whereas in 2D you lose the depth but also your peripheral vision seems to become smaller.
Even the daft demo 3D stuff is mad as things literally come out of the screen and it feels as if you can reach out and grab it. Aye the novelty wears off or some simply can't get away with it for some reason (eyesight possibly?) but some of the 3D stuff is a 'different world' when you compare it to the 2D version. Best watched in the dark (I do this anyway) due to flicker if surroundings are light and also helps with the immersive feeling.
Am I the only one with a 3D TV? Mine is a Samsung 55" Active 3D (better than Passive) and was the top of range £2500 TV a few years back but I picked it up on Gumtree last year for £250 Even though it's now a dead technology, there's still plenty to watch on 3D from over the years and there's still some stuff being released.
I think it's class as I also got the Samsung 3D Bluray player with 5.1 Surround which is excellent sound quality as the rumble from the bass is deep enough. Watching stuff like Jurassic World/Avatar/Gravity was f***ing class (better at cinema of course) as you get 'immersed' in the picture whereas in 2D you lose the depth but also your peripheral vision seems to become smaller.
Even the daft demo 3D stuff is mad as things literally come out of the screen and it feels as if you can reach out and grab it. Aye the novelty wears off or some simply can't get away with it for some reason (eyesight possibly?) but some of the 3D stuff is a 'different world' when you compare it to the 2D version. Best watched in the dark (I do this anyway) due to flicker if surroundings are light and also helps with the immersive feeling.
Ditched a Samsung 3d TV last Christmas and got a 3d projector. TV was good but the projector is out of this world. And it only cost £340.
Ditched a Samsung 3d TV last Christmas and got a 3d projector. TV was good but the projector is out of this world. And it only cost £340.