dangermows
Striker
He wasnt offside, simple as that
He was.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He wasnt offside, simple as that
Works for BruceHammers 2 shots on target at home in 90 mins , Moyes man the lucky twat.
They would still end up measuring the *gap*Clear day light tween the players
I'd have it like the ice hockey rule . If theres clear gap between the attacker and the last defender it's off. That's a far greater advantage to the attacker than the one just there.The offside rule really needs to be changed
But far grater advantage to the attacker than that one tonight. All that measuring shite is a piss take like.They would still end up measuring the *gap*
I'd have it like the ice hockey rule . If theres clear gap between the attacker and the last defender it's off. That's a far greater advantage to the attacker than the one just there.
I’m not arguing with you marra I’m just pointing out that whatever you decide on there will be a gap to be measured.If a line can be drawn between attacker and defender and it isn't touching them both then its offside. Otherwise it should be classed as level and therefore, a goal.
I’m not arguing with you marra I’m just pointing out that whatever you decide on there will be a gap to be measured.
I’m not arguing with you marra I’m just pointing out that whatever you decide on there will be a gap to be measured.
I agree 100%It would mate but surely the advantage should go to the attacker when they've really timed their run to perfection. At the minute, if the attacker has size 9 boots, the defender 8 and they're perfectly in line then it's going to be given offside and surely that cant be right?
Did the stellar Mr Terry behave tonight ?
Justice.. 95mins of blatant cheating. Diving all over the place, and their gobshites on the sideline squealing for everything.
How would you change it (genuine question) those that wanted it have got the results they wanted, measuring decisions to the millimetre, regardless of how you *change* the law there will always be something to measure as long as VAR is in use.
Correct, once you start measuring things you need accuracy, a level of which isn’t possible in circumstances like tonight’s incident, the can of worms has been opened.Add a margin of error. VAR cannot accurately call tight offsides due to the error
I'd have it like the ice hockey rule . If theres clear gap between the attacker and the last defender it's off. That's a far greater advantage to the attacker than the one just there.
Correct, once you start measuring things you need accuracy, a level of which isn’t possible in circumstances like tonight’s incident, the can of worms has been opened.
VAR has missed the main decision which was it should be a penalty