Mackem Tommy
Striker
Good to finally see things rolling. Hopefully people can now get over the 'it's been 20 years' stuff and move forward.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yeah pity its about 15 this side of christmasses too late.Good news. Should hopefully be onsite this side of Christmas then.
Yeah pity its about 15 this side of christmasses too late.
Yeah pity its about 15 this side of christmasses too late.
Of course the labour council should have purchased the site in 1999/2000.Excuses excuses.....stop it !Yes I understand that but the council didn’t own the land 20 or 15 years ago. Sadly I doubt we will ever fully understand whether the council could have acquired it at the time or whether they stepped aside for another developer.
Regardless it’s not the same people around now as back then.
Who do you think has deeper pockets, the council or tesco?Of course the labour council should have purchased the site in 1999/2000.Excuses excuses.....stop it !
Your just an apologist for a failing council.You MUST have some sort of connection.to them.I have given alternatives but you choose conveniently to ignore.And yet despite all of your protests you have zero answers for alternative options.
Of course the labour council should have purchased the site in 1999/2000.Excuses excuses.....stop it !
There was ten year of legal wrangling and sc blocked many planning applications at the time which suggests they could have or why block planning. I’m sure I read tesco finally sell Sunderland council the Vaux site after ten years of trying.Sorry but I honestly don’t know if they were able to purchase it and that is my honest answer. Can you categorically say that SCC chose not to and had the opportunity to out bid Tesco?
There was ten year of legal wrangling and sc blocked many planning applications at the time which suggests they could have or why block planning. I’m sure I read tesco finally sell Sunderland council the Vaux site after ten years of trying.
Your just an apologist for a failing council.You MUST have some sort of connection.to them.I have given alternatives but you choose conveniently to ignore.
Just a load of spin and meaningless inuendo from you .How anyone can defend this and past inept Labour councils is beyond me ? .I can only conclude you have a strong connection to them.You havent like. Ive asked 4 times now & avoid answering every time. Instead just giving a list of things the shouldnt have done
Just been watching apprentice & sugar has said the same thing about criticism & solutions.
And stop repeating Lens tedious crack. Its another classic example of having no answers. Get challenged on something? Must be one of them..
Just a load of spin and meaningless inuendo from you .How anyone can defend this and past inept Labour councils is beyond me ? .I can only conclude you have a strong connection to them.
Not to sound rambling but I can see lens point like. It’s easy for a labour council to blame government funding but tbf, Vaux shut under a labour government and local labour council, it was bought by Tesco’s under the same regime. It just feels like when the Tory’s got in it all changed. The site was bought back and now tenants are moving into the building, the bridge is up and the new road on the way. It just seems in the last few years this Tory government have ploughed money into the city.
Me personally I think people up here vote like they support the footie team ‘till they die” which is silly.
If the local council want to take credit for what is happening in the city atm surely they should brunt some of the blame for the bad things but they seem to blame (like many on here) central Tory government cuts, or the cuts from the Tory government before. People need to look to the future when voting and going back on what’s happened to the Vaux site and the strides the city is making now it involves the Tory’s unfortunately.
It's true that the initial funding was secured under a Labour government, but after the failed Iconic bridge project, I think the whole thing had to get resubmitted, under a Conservative government which obviously was granted, the new bridge also had to survive a spending review under the Austority review which both Labour and Conservative political parties insisted was required after the financial crash.Whether you have a Labour council or a Tory council wouldn't really make a lot of difference. The biggest factor holding Sunderland (and the North East in general) back is geography imho. Another brake that has been taken off Sunderland developing is not being part of the remit of a regional development agency in 2012 and having much more autonomy in the decisions it makes/takes.
And funding for the bridge was secured in 2009 when there was a Labour government.
Not to sound rambling but I can see lens point like. It’s easy for a labour council to blame government funding but tbf, Vaux shut under a labour government and local labour council, it was bought by Tesco’s under the same regime. It just feels like when the Tory’s got in it all changed. The site was bought back and now tenants are moving into the building, the bridge is up and the new road on the way. It just seems in the last few years this Tory government have ploughed money into the city.
Me personally I think people up here vote like they support the footie team ‘till they die” which is silly.
If the local council want to take credit for what is happening in the city atm surely they should brunt some of the blame for the bad things but they seem to blame (like many on here) central Tory government cuts, or the cuts from the Tory government before. People need to look to the future when voting and going back on what’s happened to the Vaux site and the strides the city is making now it involves the Tory’s unfortunately.
It's true that the initial funding was secured under a Labour government, but after the failed Iconic bridge project, I think the whole thing had to get resubmitted, under a Conservative government which obviously was granted, the new bridge also had to survive a spending review under the Austority review which both Labour and Conservative political parties insisted was required after the financial crash.
how many years since the council acquired it?Who do you think has deeper pockets, the council or tesco?
It's true that the initial funding was secured under a Labour government, but after the failed Iconic bridge project, I think the whole thing had to get resubmitted, under a Conservative government which obviously was granted, the new bridge also had to survive a spending review under the Austority review which both Labour and Conservative political parties insisted was required after the financial crash.
how many years since the council acquired it?