1. The forums are temporarily closed for new registrations
    We expect to re-open for new users towards the end of July.
    Dismiss Notice

VAR - appeals

Discussion in 'Pure Football' started by Smiler, Jul 14, 2019.

  1. Smiler

    Smiler Striker

    Why not use it in a similar vein to other sports whereby you get 3 chances a half to appeal a decision and if you get them wrong that's it you get no more appeals? Maybe three appeals a half is too many and a captain gets two chances to appeal and that's it.
    They are only allowed to do it once the ball is dead and you can only make it the first time the ball goes dead after the event.
    VAR is here to stay so might as well add a bit of excitement to it all
     
  2. johnnyat87

    johnnyat87 Winger

    This is new.
     
  3. Randy Ostrich

    Randy Ostrich Striker

    Would be better than the random nature of it now. Game goes on as is unless a team captain appeals and then the ref could check it. One per game for the howler.
     
  4. Brainman

    Brainman Midfield

    It should be applied when there is an obvious error.
    Not when the scorer is offside by a toenail.
    There should be an umpire's decision as in cricket.
    If it's not obvious after a quick look then let it go.
     
    super noodles and parsonjohn1985 like this.
  5. Johnsafc

    Johnsafc Striker

    Should be applied purely on offsides imo. Everything else is merely interpretation
     
  6. I love the 3 challenges to the ref, why 3 why not 297? Our 1? Let’s just hope they start getting things right as no matter how many challenges a team has it will still come down to the var and ref being right, and as we have seen they have made errors left,right and centre even with the use of var
     
  7. Martsafc1958

    Martsafc1958 Reserve Squad

    I’m watching the cricket World Cup final and see their VAR decisions are taken by the ‘man in the box’ and that person walks and talks their way through the decision over the tannoy to the crowd. I wonder if football could do likewise.
     
  8. Cricket is miles ahead of football for var. Football is a complete shambles.
     
    EchoMan and Martsafc1958 like this.
  9. brain_stew

    brain_stew Central Defender

    It's a far better system and much quicker; everyone knows what's going on and it barely slows the game down. VAR is a shambles in comparison.
     
  10. safcforever

    safcforever Striker

    There needs to be a ref that watches the video without all this ridiculous delaying the game
     
  11. They need to be open about why they have given it or not as well. Stuffs goes to var and they still get it wrong in football. It's pathetic.
     
  12. hank williams

    hank williams Striker

    More fucking time wasting :rolleyes:

    Tbf & as I've posted elsewhere

    Cricket is a much slower sport than footy

    A minute or two here mean fuck all in cricket

    In football is a life time

    You have literally all day in cricket or least half a day
     
    Last edited: Jul 14, 2019
    doodlebugs likes this.
  13. Aye but in cricket they go into detail on every part of the decision and confirm each section. In football the ref runs owa to a screen, watches a dodgy angle replayed at the wrong time then does whatever the fuck he feels like anyway.
     
    hank williams likes this.
  14. hank williams

    hank williams Striker

    Knew it would be a fuck up in footy from day one & ive been proved right

    There totally spoiling the game we love if a ref gets a decision wrong tough that's part & parcel

    Knew GLT would be a waste of money how many times has it been used since its invention a dozen
     
  15. DPTT

    DPTT Winger

    VAR is fucking shite and will ruin the spirit of the game within a few years.
     
    doodlebugs likes this.
  16. hank williams

    hank williams Striker

    Wait till it fucks the premiership up

    They'll want rid of it by Christmas mark my words
     
  17. Tbf with glt at least its right when it does get used. VAR is as much as a lottery as just guessing a decision without it anyway.
     
    hank williams likes this.
  18. hank williams

    hank williams Striker

    Love to kna why they have to have the var officials 50 miles away in a hotel room somewhere why not in the fucking stadium watching on a monitor
     
    samaistonsrightfoot likes this.
  19. oldboy

    oldboy Winger

    3 challenges each and we'd see more decisions going to VAR which would slow the game down further. 1 challenge each and it removes fairness. What happens if in the first minute your striker goes over a crisp packet in the box. As far as he's concern someone has tripped him. The captain hasn't seen it so has to rely on his striker who is adamant. Replays show no penalty. That means for the rest of the game the opposition can do all the niggley little things that would normally get pulled up on VAR.

    The system we have is actually best for football, it's just brand new. People saying that the 3rd umpire is far better in cricket, yes that true, but only because they've had it far longer.
     
  20. hank williams

    hank williams Striker

    & once again much slower sport than footy which is why it works so well
     
    doodlebugs likes this.

Share This Page