Udinese model? 9m worth of signings ousted after 6 months


Status
Not open for further replies.
By giving them an over weight striker who scored 0 goals in 13 games?

by giving them a player that they wanted for buttons. if they had to buy him thats different but now they have that money to strengthen their team further,as i said bizarre.
 
Loaning Danny Graham to them isn't helping them

He is better than what they already have. whether he can score them enough goals to keep them up I doubt. Hull are a poor side compared to Swansea.

still think loaning N'diaye to a small club in Trukey is a strange move for the player
 
by giving them a player that they wanted for buttons. if they had to buy him thats different but now they have that money to strengthen their team further,as i said bizarre.

:roll: whilst freeing up valuable wages for us to strengthen our hand...
 
He is better than what they already have. whether he can score them enough goals to keep them up I doubt. Hull are a poor side compared to Swansea.

still think loaning N'diaye to a small club in Trukey is a strange move for the player

No idea what's gone on there but I suspect there are personal reasons why he specfically wanted to go back to Turkey. There's no part ownership though.

by giving them a player that they wanted for buttons. if they had to buy him thats different but now they have that money to strengthen their team further,as i said bizarre.

They're spending 40K a week on his wages and we've freed up 40K a week.

Are you really this dim?
 
Last edited:
by giving them a player that they wanted for buttons. if they had to buy him thats different but now they have that money to strengthen their team further,as i said bizarre.

He's on £41k per week, 10k more than Giaccherini. Out with the overpaid deadwood, with a loan fee probably anywhere up to £1m. So in the process of loaning him out we save £41k x 52 weeks (around £2m) and recoup nearly £1m in a fee. Not bad business sense. recoup £3m of the £5m outlay in signing him and if he does alreet sell him for £2m-£3m. So money back.

Same with N'Dyia (sic).
 
They're spending 40K a week on his wages and we've freed up 40K a week.

Are you really this dim?

this fact now is it or a convenient excuse people choose to believe?.
 
He's on £41k per week, 10k more than Giaccherini. Out with the overpaid deadwood, with a loan fee probably anywhere up to £1m. So in the process of loaning him out we save £41k x 52 weeks (around £2m) and recoup nearly £1m in a fee. Not bad business sense. recoup £3m of the £5m outlay in signing him and if he does alreet sell him for £2m-£3m. So money back.

Same with N'Dyia (sic).

where has this million pound loan fee come from?.:confused:

Are you saying its not fact? Eh?

yes,until it is proven to be true then it is not a fact.
 
yeah selling him or loaning him to a team outside of the prem wouldnt do that.:roll:

A Premier League team will more than likely be able to afford a far larger percentage of his wages in comparison to a club in a lower division. Whom incidentally, will not receive the TV money... BUT of course you knew that! :roll:
 
He's on £41k per week, 10k more than Giaccherini. Out with the overpaid deadwood, with a loan fee probably anywhere up to £1m. So in the process of loaning him out we save £41k x 52 weeks (around £2m) and recoup nearly £1m in a fee. Not bad business sense. recoup £3m of the £5m outlay in signing him and if he does alreet sell him for £2m-£3m. So money back.

Same with N'Dyia (sic).

:lol::lol::oops:
 
A Premier League team will more than likely be able to afford a far larger percentage of his wages in comparison to a club in a lower division. Whom incidentally, will not receive the TV money... BUT of course you knew that! :roll:


100% apparently and dont forget the million pound loan fee.
 
A perfect riposte, I change my opinion



There will be a loan fee, however let's say there isn't. we're still getting £2m off our wages for the coming year. How can that not make business sense?

give over making things up, its embarrassing, you havne't got a f***ing clue :lol:
 
Last edited:
A perfect riposte, I change my opinion



There will be a loan fee, however let's say there isn't. we're still getting £2m off our wages for the coming year. How can that not make business sense?

100% of his wages is highly unlikely.

So you don't know the terms of the loan but are slating it?

Why would anyone do that?

I hope for your sake that you're a WUM, otherwise you're as thick as fuck. The mods really ought to ban you either way like.

a team who finished fourth bottom loans a 5 million pound striker to newly promoted team and you cant see why it looks strange?,fukk me what a clown.:roll::oops:
 
give over making things up, its embarrassing, you havne't got a f***ing clue :lol:

Making things up? Do you not understand the meaning of the word 'probably'?

100% of his wages is highly unlikely.



a team who finished fourth bottom loans a 5 million pound striker to newly promoted team and you cant see why it looks strange?,fukk me what a clown.:roll::oops:

£2m in wages on a 3rd or 4th choice striker saved and you can't see why it looks like a perfectly logical decision?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top