D
Deleted member 26022
Guest
No purely a money saving exercise
McGeady ?
Pay cut, with new deal if i remember correctly.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No purely a money saving exercise
McGeady ?
Yup. There’s nowt to say we have to go like for like. Personally, if we sell him I’d be tempted to move for a creative player - or a central midfielder who can provide some energy.I don't really mind as the numbers put into the public arena last week were fairly compelling tbf. Its not great a d losing All his wages would help enormously. Personally I'd use the money on another CB as I don't want to see any of the 4 we had last season start this one.
Yup. There’s nowt to say we have to go like for like. Personally, if we sell him I’d be tempted to move for a creative player - or a central midfielder who can provide some energy.
Yup. The difficulty is that I’m not sure how they find the players to go. Oviedo and Loovens are the only two obvious ones left.End of the day Ross wants a 20 man squad including Hume & Robson. They're at like 24 at the moment including Oviedo so we'll still be selling another few to get it down to where they want it. They're not going to go and sign another 3 players unless they leave first.
I'm not a regular mind but I've never seen him have a decent game!Honestly he's hardly a key player. He's not like McGeady, is he? If we can get him off the books then great.
LWB yeah. I also reckon you could get a tune out of Mumba there. If we go back to a back four you could use Flanagan in a pinch. That’s where he played for Burton after all.Hume and Gooch can cover that role.
I'm not a regular mind but I've never seen him have a decent game!
No purely a money saving exercise
McGeady ?
Are we going to get someone better in the replace him?
It's the angle the club have taken recently to be fair, that's very much why I made the point. They can't keep iquoting the wages cap when there are so few players who signed their current deals under the previous regime, maybe 2 or 3? Once Oviedo goes that excuse disappears.
End of the day Ross wants a 20 man squad including Hume & Robson. They're at like 24 at the moment including Oviedo so we'll still be selling another few to get it down to where they want it. They're not going to go and sign another 3 players unless they leave first.
Is everyone conveniently forgetting his good form at the start of last season? He was one of our main attacking weapons when ross was doing his lopsided defence thing. He got 3 assists in the first 3 games. But aye hes shite, nowt to do with not being utilised properly. The clown actually stumbled upon something that worked but thought, "nah we cant have that, let's change it".
We'll likely have problems shifting one or two given many have been recently signed too. Those advocating us selling Oviedo are thinking he'll be replaced, yet we're still over that 20 man squad by some distance. When they see we can't move on Baldwin, Loovens, Ozturk and have just signed Willis and McLaughlin it'll be a f***ing treat for them seeing Flanagan fill in at fullback given he was cover for that area at Burton when Hume's injured or even right sided Conor McLaughlin.
Yup. The difficulty is that I’m not sure how they find the players to go. Oviedo and Loovens are the only two obvious ones left.