True Faith bitterness overload


Status
Not open for further replies.
The editorial policy of true faith is to edit rather than censor though we will not publish material wihich is libellous, motivated by personal spite or which is hate-filled (e.g. racist etc).

that is actually on their statement page.

:eek::lol::lol::lol:

Irony overload (again!)
 
Running scared, aren't they? They know as well as we do that they were outplayed when it was 11 v 11. The lead up to the Larsson/macClean chance was lovely football and they hardly strung two passes together until the sending off. They have bullied and intimidated in the past. Not any more. And like typical bullies, they are squealing about it.
Chav club with no class. Ask most neutrals about Sunderland and you get positive comments. Ask about Newcastle and they are laughing stock. Most delusional, ignorant and bigoted club in the country. Think they are special because they have had ten years in the sun in last 50 years.
 
:eek::lol::lol::lol:

Irony overload (again!)

it only clicked when i was reading their statement page. they talk about being owned by the fans, like barca, bayern ect. no problem there
then further down, libelous, spite ect.
we are bad on here at times but true faith takes the biscuit. do they have a supporters forum?
really bitter.
 
it only clicked when i was reading their statement page. they talk about being owned by the fans, like barca, bayern ect. no problem there
then further down, libelous, spite ect.
we are bad on here at times but true faith takes the biscuit. do they have a supporters forum?
really bitter.

the difference is this is a fans forum, that's a fanzine that has, supposedly. been edited. imagine if everyone of the idiotic posts on this board was a published article.
 
The editorial policy of true faith is to edit rather than censor though we will not publish material wihich is libellous, motivated by personal spite or which is hate-filled (e.g. racist etc).

that is actually on their statement page.
so shite
 
was tempted to write to the editor but when you know he/she will twist your own words when that rubbish comes out. waste of time.
never seen anything like that in ALS


yes, never read anything like that before.
 
Jake51 said:
Thankfully not everyone holds your primordial attitude to football. That sort of shit isn't allowed anymore and so your player should have been appropriately punished. A premeditated attack like that is nothing more than the actions of a coward.

He was punished, he got a yellow card.

And only last season Nolan and Barton were kicking people up a height or have you forgotten that
 
Thankfully not everyone holds your primordial attitude to football. That sort of shit isn't allowed anymore and so your player should have been appropriately punished. A premeditated attack like that is nothing more than the actions of a coward.

I bet you weren't complaining when Shearer booted Lennon in the head, when Guthrie broke Fagan's leg or when Barton kicked Etuhu in the stomach.


Get a grip, you daft little bollock.
 
"If you haven't made an official complaint to the BBC about their policy to call our grand old home after a shop, then you should. Go to: "

:lol:

NOT BOTHERED.

Interestingly the last few BBC reports fail to mention the NUFC ground at all, by contrast the SOL is named in each of ours. BBC buckling to their wailing? Or just bottling making a decision?
 
Typical Newcastle United propaganda. They know the type of people who read their fanzine, and most of those people are utter f***ing plebs who will believe every word.

That 'article' is actually embarrassing.
 
its brilliant listening to mags cry on about how them big bullys from sunderland kicked them off the park,2 of the worse players on the pitch were tiote and simpson,both could easy have seen red.
 
So the whole article started off slagging O'Neill, the way his teams play, the way his teams show their physical side blah blah and then ENDS by claiming he has respect for O'Neill and how he wanted him as manager - hypocrisy, jealousy, bitterness etc
 
So Cattermole and McLean should have gone for their challenges. OK..that means Tiote, Simpson maybe Krul too?

There'd be no fucker left!
 
Exactly to expectations, O’Neill brought his team of thugs to St James’ Park and they set out to do what the Irishman’s teams do – foul and spoil. Every player behind the ball! For Sunderland 2012 read Leicester 1996. For Muzzy Izzett read Lee Cattermole. That is where Ellis Short’s tens of millions of pounds of investment has brought them. A team of artless cloggers! Should we be surprised? Not really, this is the club whose followers idolise Kevin Ball. We are the supporters who idolise Peter Beardsley. No more need be said.
I was absolutely staggered by Dean’s decision not to give Cattermole a straight red card for a tackle on Chieck Tiote in the opening minute. No-one will tell me this no-mark, piece of trash hadn’t been instructed all week to make a tackle like that and it comes as little consolation that the yob should be sent off for abusing the referee at the final whistle even if it does mean he and Sessegnon will miss their FAC tie at Everton as a consequence of their ill-discipline.
Truth be told that derby game could have been any one played over the last forty years and the problem was Sunderland succeeded in dragging us down to their level. O’Neill turned the game into a war and I can’t have been the only one to be flabbergasted by Dean’s decision to give Simpson a yellow card after he’d objected to being taken out by McLean in front of the Gallowgate End. The Irishman should have gone for that.


But the real flashpoint came on the final whistle with O’Neill seeking to distract media scrutiny from his team of ale-house scrappers by making fully unsubstantiated allegations against Newcastle United’s coaching team. O’Neill claims he “heard” members of the United coaching team had visited the Ref at HT. Maybe these are voices in his head. That has been completely denied by Alan Pardew. So now O’Neill either needs to provide proof about this s0-called visit or retract the serious allegation immediately. If the man is wrong, then he needs to accept that. If he’s not, prove it. If he can’t prove it and doesn’t retract it, then the man is an idiot or a liar. I am writing this as someone who has had respect for O’Neill and an admiration for him. This fanzine wanted him as manager when Souness was sacked. What O’Neill does with Sunderland in every other fixture they play is absolutely immaterial to us but accusing our people of underhand tactics following a match when we have just witnessed his team turn a game into a kicking competition is just beyond the pale. O’Neill’s decision to decline Pardew’s offer a post-match drink as is the tradition smacks of a classlessness. O’Neill has every reason to be disappointed his team was denied its first win at St James’ Park in twelve years but he should have learnt to act with some kind of professionalism and decorum.


Let it be on the record, if O’Neill does not retract his allegations about Alan Pardew or provide evidence before Tuesday morning, we put it to him that he is a liar!

did this prick say anything about their ten million pound donkey.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top