LondonMackem
Striker
To a newspaper should be banned. It's just a lazy attempt to spam the board and it's boring as fuck.
Threads with just a link
- Thread starter LondonMackem
- Start date
- Status
LondonMackem
Striker
@steve30000 is having a good go today, the massive whopper
dangermows
Striker
Agreed.
chriswallace85
Striker
Cue numerous hilarious threads with nowt but a link in the OP.
itscoldinhere
Winger
Indeed
steve30000
Striker
What's the problem, lads? That's what this forum is for. 
I think a few are just weirdly angry because I might have posted threads that they probably wanted to post first. Odd as fuck imo
I think a few are just weirdly angry because I might have posted threads that they probably wanted to post first. Odd as fuck imo
Some Random Guy
Striker
It happened.
I don't think they should be banned necessarily, maybe have their permissions to create new threads disabled for a month or something.
It's just lazy. If you think an article is worth a thread then it most be worth writing something about, even if it's just a sentence or two.
We've sunk much lower.
If it starts a conversation then I disagree, even if it is lazy/trolling.
dcl0sc
Striker
He hates you marra.... incidentally, I think you're an utter bell end too!...
xxxArnly joking!
Some Random Guy
Striker
The onus should be on the op to start the conversation surely?
Its even lazier than a thread with a title like "9/11 was an inside job" then a one word of "discuss".
Napoleon Dynamite
Striker
Tell you what gets me livid, in fact I’m fuming now before I even type it
Start a thread and put ‘thoughts’
Get fucked man
I agree, it's lazy af. When Dangermows does it it's usually an attempt at a troll, but most of the time the threads with just a link end up being semi-decent threads where the actual issue eventually gets addressed. So in the end, the thread was worth making imo.
Most people just come here to shitpost anyway, regardless of whether or not the OP put the effort in.
- Status
