Thoughts on Seelt?

  • Thread starter Deleted member 55422
  • Start date

Looked shit tbh but can't blame him given he was played out of position and then played most the game massively exposed thanks to some awful tactical decisions.
 
Never a full back I reckon he was at fault for 1 maybe 2 goals . Will judge him when he's at CB.

O9 should of been moved to RB but Mowbray is shit scared to make any tactical changes.
 
I wouldn't have said he was directly at fault for the first two but could have done better. The Team was all at sea with 10 men and no central midfield to speak of, and being peppered from all angles. A baptism of fire, he'll hopefully learn from. He did some good defending in among it all too.
 
Looked poor lets not beat around the bush.
Always going to be hard with 10 men but he was poor
Thought he looked decent in the circumstances. Clearly comfortable with the ball, and didn’t defend badly given how much pressure we were under.
Really? Some fans baffle me, He was hopeless man
 
Dogshit. Not exactly great circumstances to make proper debut but struggle to take any positives.
 
He'll be alright when he gets a run of games in his natural position. Looks canny on the ball. Didn't realise he's quite a big lad. Wonder if Mowbray will pair him with Ballard v Stoke and move O'Nien into midfield with Neil suspended and Ekwah not likely to be fully up to speed.
 
Looks very comfortable on the ball. But that second half is the exact situation you don’t want to expose young players like that to. Bit of a disaster really, just got to write it off and say it’s something he may learn from.
 
Hard to judge playing out of position with 10 men, haway man, looked alright first half but the only player that played remotely well second half was Ballard
 

Back
Top