B
ben
Guest
No your not wrong, but there are loads of Carroll cocksuckers on here that will tell you otherwise.
And also loads of posters incapable of offering a sensible judgement because of the team he plays for.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No your not wrong, but there are loads of Carroll cocksuckers on here that will tell you otherwise.
And also loads of posters incapable of offering a sensible judgement because of the team he plays for.
this. Henderson will always struggle when the team bypasses midfield. Hoofball didn't really help Carroll eitherFrom what I saw, he won his headers mainly, put himself about but was no direct threat. He did ok and was certainly more prominent than Jordan, entirely due to the fact that the team tried to hit him constantly.
this. Henderson will always struggle when the team bypasses midfield. Hoofball didn't really help Carroll either
Capello had a centre half playing at right back, the left back doesn't get a game for Arsenal, Lescott and Richards rarely get games for City. I know he's got to experiment but as you say, it was shambolic, get the ball, hoof it up front for Carroll to flick onto.... Gerrard who's starting 20 yards behind himCarroll would have had a better game if the wingers had actually been wingers and got down the sides to whip crosses in.
The whole set up seemed shambolic , Henderson was no worse than the rest of midfield and Carroll did ok but could have been better if the team he played for him. I dare say having Henderson wide right could have benefited Carroll.
Can't honestly say any of the new, newish boys stood out.
It's got fuck all to do with that, here are the facts, Carroll played for 70 odd minutes ish without any meaningful contribution, Crouch played 35 minutes ish, and scored a goal, held the ball up better to bring players into the game and that's when England started to play better and that's a f***ing fact, so sod off back to the Carroll wankfest.
It's got fuck all to do with that, here are the facts, Carroll played for 70 odd minutes ish without any meaningful contribution, Crouch played 35 minutes ish, and scored a goal, held the ball up better to bring players into the game and that's when England started to play better and that's a f***ing fact, so sod off back to the Carroll wankfest.
If (as an SAFC player) Kenwyne Jones were able to play for England and he put in the exact same performance as Caroll did last night, the smb would have been joining in the wankfest. It really is as simple as that.
Did he really have a good debut? I heard the commentators last night and have read some of the comments in the papers this morning. Am I bias, being a Sunderland fan when I thought he was very average at best![]()
If (as an SAFC player) Kenwyne Jones were able to play for England and he put in the exact same performance as Caroll did last night, the smb would have been joining in the wankfest. It really is as simple as that.
If (as an SAFC player) Kenwyne Jones were able to play for England and he put in the exact same performance as Caroll did last night, the smb would have been joining in the wankfest. It really is as simple as that.
You got a sort of mention in the Sunday Sun this week, are you chuffed?