I once sat on the steering group for a pandemic response simulation...doesn’t mean we knew when a pandemic was going to happen, just that one will
There are three things in life you can count on
death, taxes and pandemics
Last edited:
-
Happy St George's Day Guest
I once sat on the steering group for a pandemic response simulation...doesn’t mean we knew when a pandemic was going to happen, just that one will
There are three things in life you can count on
death, taxes and pandemics
Super Mario
Central Defender
Are you trying to say drs are deliberately killing their patients?Also the massive increase of midazolam in hospitals the last year on covid patients. A drug that suppresses the respiratory system and used to sedate people
Repswick
Winger
Wasn’t demanding. You just made a claim and was wondering where you got the info.
Nowhere it would seem.
Enable
Full Back
Was meaning frijj there he usually wants the info … can’t remember what the source was now sorry but will post when I come across it again
hairynaker
Winger
Him and others have been warning for quite a while, we have been lucky so far and it's a sad state of affairs that we have been war gaming it but then not taken the actions needed.
We got lucky with SARS and MERS and to some extent we have those viruses to thank for the current vaccine.
Covid-19 won't be the last pandemic and people will be hoping we plan better for the next, like we should have done after event 201.
It's like having the exercises they do to look at a big terrorist events but then not putting any actions in place.
What do you mean you can’t remember the source? You just posted what you thought the source was. It was a DM link.
How could you know it is bollocks if you stopped reading? Classic Frijj, gotta love it. Here is the rest of what was writ. No one likes an incomplete bracket
I am going to dip into a personal argument here, but my grandfather (who was old and had health problems) collapsed immediately after the vaccine, spent two weeks in hospital and died. My Gran from the other side (who had no health problems and was active) died two weeks after the vaccine. I spoke to both relevant doctors, who both informed me that they were surprised by both deaths. The doctor who performed the post mortem on my grandfather, I asked if he thought the vaccine could have caused it. He said yes, but he was not allowed to include on the post mortem as he was not provided with any methodology of how the vaccine could cause death. I said, perhaps that it is untested means, one might not know what the consequences could be. The conversation drifted off. My mother spent three weeks bedridden after hers. Should I really be compelled by thread of my freedoms to have such medical treatment that has so many questions, and has had such an effect over my immediate family? Should anyone? (No is the reasonable answer). Furthermore is it possible that maybe my family has a genetic disposition that may be aggravated by this?
*this vaccine doesn't appear to have been designed to stop transmission or infection. All it appears to do is lower you symptoms. In fact people are still "catching" covid after being fully vaccinated.
The poor nuns of Kentucky (two of whom died?) is one of many instances.
80% of the nuns in this Kentucky convent got COVID 2 days after vaccine - LifeSite
Out of 35 nuns, 26 tested positive for COVID just two days after getting the vaccine.
www.lifesitenews.com
*The bloated covid death certificates. Never before in the history of death certificates, has a governemnt changed how deaths are reported. Why now are counting it as anyone who dies with covid in their body, as opposed to having died of covid. Does this not strike any of you as actually insane???? Until covid, all coronaviruses, (common colds) were never listed as a primary cause of death. The pandemic looks to have been massively bloated. (Do you remember those videos of wuhan of people literally falling on the street and writhing in agony? Has anyone seen that?) To compare like for like, I guess one could go back over past flu and cold seasons and retrospectively change the death rates, but that would cause a pandemic every year surely? According to the CDC, (sorry American orientated I know), but only 6% of deaths attributed to covid are actually due to covid (scroll down to comorbidities and other conditions section). In other words, Frijj, this terrible pandemic - any numbers you see on the news are bloated by about 94%. In short, the pandemic is the same as every year. Here is a cool joke I made up. One homeless guy says to another, "hey how come we haven't got covid?" the other homeless guy says "we don't have a TV"
COVID-19 Provisional Counts - Weekly Updates by Select Demographic and Geographic Characteristics
Tabulated data on provisional COVID-19 deaths by age, sex, race and Hispanic origin, and comorbidities. Also includes an index of state-level and county-level mortality data available for download.
www.cdc.gov
*censorship and the complete absence of scientific debate. In the undeniable context of this, one could reasonably assume that it might be reasonable to uh, hold off on an experimental medical treatment until proper scientific debate is had? I know you are not a big fan of science though Frijj, so I appreciate this may not be of much concern for you. Its ok not to be a big fan of science by the way, I am not having a go
. And yeah this point is possibly me being overly me...I really really enjoyed watching the national and global robust debates put upon by health officials, scientists, etc from the best minds of the world debating things like social distancing (technically physical distancing), mask wearing, lockdowns, vaccine safety, how to measure susceptibility to vaccine injury, treatment options outside of vaccines. Wasn't it heartwarming to see the "science" vigourously questioned? The vaccine companies grilled and answering important questions? Oh was that a dream I had. It must have been because NONE OF THAT HAPPENED. There are plenty of scientists out there with different opinions, I would like to hear from them to make up my own mind. Oh wait, the public don't get to hear from them, you have to search the crevices of the reality to find them. Maybe I am strange, but if someone is censored, I want to hear why. Do you really not have a problem with censorship? What about when someone is very pro vaccine, has spent their entire professional carear overseeing the development of vaccines, becomes one of the lead virologists in the world and is now shouting from the rooftops that there is a massive problem (Geert Vanden Bossche). Is it ok to listen to him? You can have a look for what he says yourself if you are interested, but in summary:
- the covid vaccine may be putting so much pressure on the virus that we are accelerating it's ability to mutate and become more deadly.
- the covid vaccines may be creating vaccine-resistant viruses (similar to anti-biotic resistant bacteria).
- because of previous problems with Antibody Dependent Enhancement, we may be looking at a mass casualty event in the next few months/years.
As are all humans. The most concerning thing for me is that people actually think they have a right to restrict the freedom of others. Rights exist fundamentally and cannot be given or taken away by others. You just happen to have them.
When you isolate people, and damage their immune systems through encouraging mask wearing, minimising human contact, as well as discourage people from going to hospitals for regular circumstances, as well as pouring Fear porn through the media waves do you expect death waves to go up? I think there was something out there this year but not a pandemic, nor necessarily a virus. Remember that even in the spanish flu, the main deaths came from bacteria, not a virus. Source:
Fauci - bacteria
(the same dude who was advocating bacteria farm masks in America without challenge)
If this is a pandemic, what about the five or six years with higher death rates since 1993 than 2020? 1993 was higher, even with a population 10 odd million lower. The reason is because there wasn't so much fear porn
.Guess how many hospitals I work for?
Not that I don't trust you. Or your mates. But I also trust my observations. So I am in a bit of a trust dilemma... not that I expect you to trust me. I would hope that you can at least trust yourself.
As a little FYI, there is no actual evidence ever that viruses are either a cause or an effect of disease. There is a legit scientific perspective that for colds and flus (coronaviruses) what are identified as viruses are actually the effect of your bodies natural process of detoxification. If the gov are forcing people to live unhealthy lives, closing the gyms, letting them rot at home out the sun and near the beer fridge, lonely, with masks and never seeing smiles, what do you think happens to the toxin levels in their bodies?
but also highly immoral to take peoples freedoms away, kind of on an apartheid, except replacing race with people who consider their body their choice? Can you not see you are on very very very dodgy moral terrain with this one?
Hmmm. I wonder whether the vaccine agenda kicked off big style in the 1960's?
Last edited:
Super Mario
Central Defender
There's is absolutely mountains of real world evidence that viruses cause illness a cold rips through a family or a hospital or a school in no time at all, these are all things which constantly can be seen in real time in the real world without any implications of bias, I'm assuming you don't believe in germ theory or contagion judging by the way you're talking?How could you know it is bollocks if you stopped reading? Classic Frijj, gotta love it. Here is the rest of what was writ. No one likes an incomplete bracket
I am going to dip into a personal argument here, but my grandfather (who was old and had health problems) collapsed immediately after the vaccine, spent two weeks in hospital and died. My Gran from the other side (who had no health problems and was active) died two weeks after the vaccine. I spoke to both relevant doctors, who both informed me that they were surprised by both deaths. The doctor who performed the post mortem on my grandfather, I asked if he thought the vaccine could have caused it. He said yes, but he was not allowed to include on the post mortem as he was not provided with any methodology of how the vaccine could cause death. I said, perhaps that it is untested means, one might not know what the consequences could be. The conversation drifted off. My mother spent three weeks bedridden after hers. Should I really be compelled by thread of my freedoms to have such medical treatment that has so many questions, and has had such an effect over my immediate family? Should anyone? (No is the reasonable answer). Furthermore is it possible that maybe my family has a genetic disposition that may be aggravated by this?
*this vaccine doesn't appear to have been designed to stop transmission or infection. All it appears to do is lower you symptoms. In fact people are still "catching" covid after being fully vaccinated.
The poor nuns of Kentucky (two of whom died?) is one of many instances.
80% of the nuns in this Kentucky convent got COVID 2 days after vaccine - LifeSite
Out of 35 nuns, 26 tested positive for COVID just two days after getting the vaccine.
*The bloated covid death certificates. Never before in the history of death certificates, has a governemnt changed how deaths are reported. Why now are counting it as anyone who dies with covid in their body, as opposed to having died of covid. Does this not strike any of you as actually insane???? Until covid, all coronaviruses, (common colds) were never listed as a primary cause of death. The pandemic looks to have been massively bloated. (Do you remember those videos of wuhan of people literally falling on the street and writhing in agony? Has anyone seen that?) To compare like for like, I guess one could go back over past flu and cold seasons and retrospectively change the death rates, but that would cause a pandemic every year surely? According to the CDC, (sorry American orientated I know), but only 6% of deaths attributed to covid are actually due to covid (scroll down to comorbidities and other conditions section). In other words, Frijj, this terrible pandemic - any numbers you see on the news are bloated by about 94%. In short, the pandemic is the same as every year. Here is a cool joke I made up. One homeless guy says to another, "hey how come we haven't got covid?" the other homeless guy says "we don't have a TV"
COVID-19 Provisional Counts - Weekly Updates by Select Demographic and Geographic Characteristics
Tabulated data on provisional COVID-19 deaths by age, sex, race and Hispanic origin, and comorbidities. Also includes an index of state-level and county-level mortality data available for download.
*censorship and the complete absence of scientific debate. In the undeniable context of this, one could reasonably assume that it might be reasonable to uh, hold off on an experimental medical treatment until proper scientific debate is had? I know you are not a big fan of science though Frijj, so I appreciate this may not be of much concern for you. Its ok not to be a big fan of science by the way, I am not having a go
I really really enjoyed watching the national and global robust debates put upon by health officials, scientists, etc from the best minds of the world debating things like social distancing (technically physical distancing), mask wearing, lockdowns, vaccine safety, how to measure susceptibility to vaccine injury, treatment options outside of vaccines. Wasn't it heartwarming to see the "science" vigourously questioned? The vaccine companies grilled and answering important questions? Oh was that a dream I had. It must have been because NONE OF THAT HAPPENED. There are plenty of scientists out there with different opinions, I would like to hear from them to make up my own mind. Oh wait, the public don't get to hear from them, you have to search the crevices of the reality to find them. Maybe I am strange, but if someone is censored, I want to hear why. Do you really not have a problem with censorship? What about when someone is very pro vaccine, has spent their entire professional carear overseeing the development of vaccines, becomes one of the lead virologists in the world and is now shouting from the rooftops that there is a massive problem (Geert Vanden Bossche). Is it ok to listen to him? You can have a look for what he says yourself if you are interested, but in summary:
In short, they are my reasons for not wanting the vaccine. I hope that they make sense to you all. We all want to live in a world of freedom, we all want to do our bit to help others live well, we all want to have our opinions expressed without fear of attack. I have looked into this as best I can, and will continue to do so, but ultimately I think my reasoned and rational points above are legitimate. Agree or disagree with me, you are a human worthy of love or respect. Hopefully we can still be friend Frijj?
- the covid vaccine may be putting so much pressure on the virus that we are accelerating it's ability to mutate and become more deadly.
- the covid vaccines may be creating vaccine-resistant viruses (similar to anti-biotic resistant bacteria).
- because of previous problems with Antibody Dependent Enhancement, we may be looking at a mass casualty event in the next few months/years.
As are all humans. The most concerning thing for me is that people actually think they have a right to restrict the freedom of others. Rights exist fundamentally and cannot be given or taken away by others. You just happen to have them.
When you isolate people, and damage their immune systems through encouraging mask wearing, minimising human contact, as well as discourage people from going to hospitals for regular circumstances, as well as pouring Fear porn through the media waves do you expect death waves to go up? I think there was something out there this year but not a pandemic, nor necessarily a virus. Remember that even in the spanish flu, the main deaths came from bacteria, not a virus. Source:
Fauci - bacteria
(the same dude who was advocating bacteria farm masks in America without challenge)
If this is a pandemic, what about the five or six years with higher death rates since 1993 than 2020? 1993 was higher, even with a population 10 odd million lower. The reason is because there wasn't so much fear porn
Guess how many hospitals I work for?
Not that I don't trust you. Or your mates. But I also trust my observations. So I am in a bit of a trust dilemma... not that I expect you to trust me. I would hope that you can at least trust yourself.
As a little FYI, there is no actual evidence ever that viruses are either a cause or an effect of disease. There is a legit scientific perspective that for colds and flus (coronaviruses) what are identified as viruses are actually the effect of your bodies natural process of detoxification. If the gov are forcing people to live unhealthy lives, closing the gyms, letting them rot at home out the sun and near the beer fridge, lonely, with masks and never seeing smiles, what do you think happens to the toxin levels in their bodies?
but also highly immoral to take peoples freedoms away, kind of on an apartheid, except replacing race with people who consider their body their choice? Can you not see you are on very very very dodgy moral terrain with this one?
Hmmm. I wonder whether the vaccine agenda kicked off big style in the 1960's?
How could you know it is bollocks if you stopped reading? Classic Frijj, gotta love it. Here is the rest of what was writ. No one likes an incomplete bracket
I am going to dip into a personal argument here, but my grandfather (who was old and had health problems) collapsed immediately after the vaccine, spent two weeks in hospital and died. My Gran from the other side (who had no health problems and was active) died two weeks after the vaccine. I spoke to both relevant doctors, who both informed me that they were surprised by both deaths. The doctor who performed the post mortem on my grandfather, I asked if he thought the vaccine could have caused it. He said yes, but he was not allowed to include on the post mortem as he was not provided with any methodology of how the vaccine could cause death. I said, perhaps that it is untested means, one might not know what the consequences could be. The conversation drifted off. My mother spent three weeks bedridden after hers. Should I really be compelled by thread of my freedoms to have such medical treatment that has so many questions, and has had such an effect over my immediate family? Should anyone? (No is the reasonable answer). Furthermore is it possible that maybe my family has a genetic disposition that may be aggravated by this?
*this vaccine doesn't appear to have been designed to stop transmission or infection. All it appears to do is lower you symptoms. In fact people are still "catching" covid after being fully vaccinated.
The poor nuns of Kentucky (two of whom died?) is one of many instances.
80% of the nuns in this Kentucky convent got COVID 2 days after vaccine - LifeSite
Out of 35 nuns, 26 tested positive for COVID just two days after getting the vaccine.
*The bloated covid death certificates. Never before in the history of death certificates, has a governemnt changed how deaths are reported. Why now are counting it as anyone who dies with covid in their body, as opposed to having died of covid. Does this not strike any of you as actually insane???? Until covid, all coronaviruses, (common colds) were never listed as a primary cause of death. The pandemic looks to have been massively bloated. (Do you remember those videos of wuhan of people literally falling on the street and writhing in agony? Has anyone seen that?) To compare like for like, I guess one could go back over past flu and cold seasons and retrospectively change the death rates, but that would cause a pandemic every year surely? According to the CDC, (sorry American orientated I know), but only 6% of deaths attributed to covid are actually due to covid (scroll down to comorbidities and other conditions section). In other words, Frijj, this terrible pandemic - any numbers you see on the news are bloated by about 94%. In short, the pandemic is the same as every year. Here is a cool joke I made up. One homeless guy says to another, "hey how come we haven't got covid?" the other homeless guy says "we don't have a TV"
COVID-19 Provisional Counts - Weekly Updates by Select Demographic and Geographic Characteristics
Tabulated data on provisional COVID-19 deaths by age, sex, race and Hispanic origin, and comorbidities. Also includes an index of state-level and county-level mortality data available for download.
*censorship and the complete absence of scientific debate. In the undeniable context of this, one could reasonably assume that it might be reasonable to uh, hold off on an experimental medical treatment until proper scientific debate is had? I know you are not a big fan of science though Frijj, so I appreciate this may not be of much concern for you. Its ok not to be a big fan of science by the way, I am not having a go
I really really enjoyed watching the national and global robust debates put upon by health officials, scientists, etc from the best minds of the world debating things like social distancing (technically physical distancing), mask wearing, lockdowns, vaccine safety, how to measure susceptibility to vaccine injury, treatment options outside of vaccines. Wasn't it heartwarming to see the "science" vigourously questioned? The vaccine companies grilled and answering important questions? Oh was that a dream I had. It must have been because NONE OF THAT HAPPENED. There are plenty of scientists out there with different opinions, I would like to hear from them to make up my own mind. Oh wait, the public don't get to hear from them, you have to search the crevices of the reality to find them. Maybe I am strange, but if someone is censored, I want to hear why. Do you really not have a problem with censorship? What about when someone is very pro vaccine, has spent their entire professional carear overseeing the development of vaccines, becomes one of the lead virologists in the world and is now shouting from the rooftops that there is a massive problem (Geert Vanden Bossche). Is it ok to listen to him? You can have a look for what he says yourself if you are interested, but in summary:
In short, they are my reasons for not wanting the vaccine. I hope that they make sense to you all. We all want to live in a world of freedom, we all want to do our bit to help others live well, we all want to have our opinions expressed without fear of attack. I have looked into this as best I can, and will continue to do so, but ultimately I think my reasoned and rational points above are legitimate. Agree or disagree with me, you are a human worthy of love or respect. Hopefully we can still be friend Frijj?
- the covid vaccine may be putting so much pressure on the virus that we are accelerating it's ability to mutate and become more deadly.
- the covid vaccines may be creating vaccine-resistant viruses (similar to anti-biotic resistant bacteria).
- because of previous problems with Antibody Dependent Enhancement, we may be looking at a mass casualty event in the next few months/years.
As are all humans. The most concerning thing for me is that people actually think they have a right to restrict the freedom of others. Rights exist fundamentally and cannot be given or taken away by others. You just happen to have them.
When you isolate people, and damage their immune systems through encouraging mask wearing, minimising human contact, as well as discourage people from going to hospitals for regular circumstances, as well as pouring Fear porn through the media waves do you expect death waves to go up? I think there was something out there this year but not a pandemic, nor necessarily a virus. Remember that even in the spanish flu, the main deaths came from bacteria, not a virus. Source:
Fauci - bacteria
(the same dude who was advocating bacteria farm masks in America without challenge)
If this is a pandemic, what about the five or six years with higher death rates since 1993 than 2020? 1993 was higher, even with a population 10 odd million lower. The reason is because there wasn't so much fear porn
Guess how many hospitals I work for?
Not that I don't trust you. Or your mates. But I also trust my observations. So I am in a bit of a trust dilemma... not that I expect you to trust me. I would hope that you can at least trust yourself.
As a little FYI, there is no actual evidence ever that viruses are either a cause or an effect of disease. There is a legit scientific perspective that for colds and flus (coronaviruses) what are identified as viruses are actually the effect of your bodies natural process of detoxification. If the gov are forcing people to live unhealthy lives, closing the gyms, letting them rot at home out the sun and near the beer fridge, lonely, with masks and never seeing smiles, what do you think happens to the toxin levels in their bodies?
but also highly immoral to take peoples freedoms away, kind of on an apartheid, except replacing race with people who consider their body their choice? Can you not see you are on very very very dodgy moral terrain with this one?
Hmmm. I wonder whether the vaccine agenda kicked off big style in the 1960's?
If you can’t condense your points into something manageable, I’m not going to be able to give you a proper reply.
It’s just a wall of text, 99% of which is conspiracist stuff.
I’m highly dubious of your claim that you work in a hospital mind. Half of the things you’ve said are plain wrong, the other half impossible to verify as they’re anecdotal or just no sources.
Last edited:
Yep I thought that was a possibility. But that is less a reflection on myself than on them. Wonder why I use the username mirror?
Its because my posts are mirrors. If a troll reads them trolling they will see, if a philosopher reads them a philosophy he will see, if a monkey reads them monkeyish they will see, if no-one reads them nobody it must be
.Sorry that sounds a little condescending. I don't actually think you are nobody. In Lak'ech Ala K'in.
If you haven't read it, I can assure you that it is quite interesting, even if it is only to read a perspective that is not your own. I find trying on different reality hats, and seeing if they fit, if not trying a new one on, is a good path to wisdom.
In Lak-ech Ala K'in Repswich. In Lak-ech.
A lazy scholar is no scholar! Although I hear what you say to an extent, and yes, if someone has an argument it should be able to be condensed, however, sometimes it turns out that some points require more words than others.
It is a wall of text that looks a lot on a forum, yet is actually only 1 A4 page - and no obligation to read the links, you know.
If you are unable to read a page, to give a proper reply, then sorry, but we operate differently. Can I recommend the Daily Star if you like short and punchy? Genuine question - have you ever read a book?
It isn't conspiracy stuff. It is all sourced, and the majority, although admittedly not all are sourced from scientific publications, I wouldn't consider any of the rest dodgy sites. If you judge things that are contrary to what an authority figure tells you then you might call it conspiracy stuff. Although I maintain disagreeing with a particular view does not make one a conspiracy theorist. Are you aware of the concept of critical thought?
If you judge things on their own merits, as a proper scholar should you wouldn't call it conspiracy stuff. I note that you regularly don't provide sources to the propaganda you project How come the double standards? Have you any sources to counter the argument.
I am an accountant for two hospitals. If you are dubious of this claim, I am happy to accept a private convo to prove it, yet I would rather not post too much onto the web. I also come from a medical family
Not connected but I read this the other day, and thought it might amuse you, although I'll be honest I find it hard to imagine you amused:
On The Psychology Of The Conspiracy Denier
Tim Foyle Why is it that otherwise perfectly intelligent, thoughtful and rationally minded people baulk at the suggestion that sociopaths are conspiring to manipulate and deceive them? And why will…
off-guardian.org
Last edited:
Yep I thought that was a possibility. But that is less a reflection on myself than on them. Wonder why I use the username mirror?
Its because my posts are mirrors. If a troll reads them trolling they will see, if a philosopher reads them a philosophy he will see, if a monkey reads them monkeyish they will see, if no-one reads them nobody it must be
Sorry that sounds a little condescending. I don't actually think you are nobody. In Lak'ech Ala K'in.
If you haven't read it, I can assure you that it is quite interesting, even if it is only to read a perspective that is not your own. I find trying on different reality hats, and seeing if they fit, if not trying a new one on, is a good path to wisdom.
In Lak-ech Ala K'in Repswich. In Lak-ech.
A lazy scholar is no scholar! Although I hear what you say to an extent, and yes, if someone has an argument it should be able to be condensed, however, sometimes it turns out that some points require more words than others.
It is a wall of text that looks a lot on a forum, yet is actually only 1 A4 page - and no obligation to read the links, you know.
If you are unable to read a page, to give a proper reply, then sorry, but we operate differently. Can I recommend the Daily Star if you like short and punchy? Genuine question - have you ever read a book?
It isn't conspiracy stuff. It is all sourced, and the majority, although admittedly not all are sourced from scientific publications, I wouldn't consider any of the rest dodgy sites. If you judge things that are contrary to what an authority figure tells you then you might call it conspiracy stuff. Although I maintain disagreeing with a particular view does not make one a conspiracy theorist. Are you aware of the concept of critical thought?
If you judge things on their own merits, as a proper scholar should you wouldn't call it conspiracy stuff. I note that you regularly don't provide sources to the propaganda you project How come the double standards? Have you any sources to counter the argument.
I am an accountant for two hospitals. If you are dubious of this claim, I am happy to accept a private convo to prove it, yet I would rather not post too much onto the web. I also come from a medical family
Not connected but I read this the other day, and thought it might amuse you, although I'll be honest I find it hard to imagine you amused:
On The Psychology Of The Conspiracy Denier
Tim Foyle Why is it that otherwise perfectly intelligent, thoughtful and rationally minded people baulk at the suggestion that sociopaths are conspiring to manipulate and deceive them? And why will…
You said that you work in a hospital to try and give your posts some kind of authority, but in reality you do a job that isn’t anything to do with patients.
Account for two hospitals is an interesting one mind, since accountants work for a trust, not for a hospital.
Super Mario
Central Defender
Can you tell me more about the people dying with respiratory problems and your beliefs about what's actually killing them? Also feel free to answer my question about germ theory and contagion?Yep I thought that was a possibility. But that is less a reflection on myself than on them. Wonder why I use the username mirror?
Its because my posts are mirrors. If a troll reads them trolling they will see, if a philosopher reads them a philosophy he will see, if a monkey reads them monkeyish they will see, if no-one reads them nobody it must be
Sorry that sounds a little condescending. I don't actually think you are nobody. In Lak'ech Ala K'in.
If you haven't read it, I can assure you that it is quite interesting, even if it is only to read a perspective that is not your own. I find trying on different reality hats, and seeing if they fit, if not trying a new one on, is a good path to wisdom.
In Lak-ech Ala K'in Repswich. In Lak-ech.
A lazy scholar is no scholar! Although I hear what you say to an extent, and yes, if someone has an argument it should be able to be condensed, however, sometimes it turns out that some points require more words than others.
It is a wall of text that looks a lot on a forum, yet is actually only 1 A4 page - and no obligation to read the links, you know.
If you are unable to read a page, to give a proper reply, then sorry, but we operate differently. Can I recommend the Daily Star if you like short and punchy? Genuine question - have you ever read a book?
It isn't conspiracy stuff. It is all sourced, and the majority, although admittedly not all are sourced from scientific publications, I wouldn't consider any of the rest dodgy sites. If you judge things that are contrary to what an authority figure tells you then you might call it conspiracy stuff. Although I maintain disagreeing with a particular view does not make one a conspiracy theorist. Are you aware of the concept of critical thought?
If you judge things on their own merits, as a proper scholar should you wouldn't call it conspiracy stuff. I note that you regularly don't provide sources to the propaganda you project How come the double standards? Have you any sources to counter the argument.
I am an accountant for two hospitals. If you are dubious of this claim, I am happy to accept a private convo to prove it, yet I would rather not post too much onto the web. I also come from a medical family
Not connected but I read this the other day, and thought it might amuse you, although I'll be honest I find it hard to imagine you amused:
On The Psychology Of The Conspiracy Denier
Tim Foyle Why is it that otherwise perfectly intelligent, thoughtful and rationally minded people baulk at the suggestion that sociopaths are conspiring to manipulate and deceive them? And why will…
GordonMuchallNo1Fan
Striker
Tony Blair, the man who used to win elections.
A phenomenally successful politician who modernised this country after Thatcher’s blundering.
parm
Striker
so if your not willing to have a new vax that nobody knows the medium/long term affects of ( how could they?) you should have your life limited , thats were we are right now in the UK 2021?
who remembers on the morning of 7/7 peter power / visor consultants running a desktop exercise in London that ran the exact scenario that played out in real life just a hour or so later , strange old world we live in
Last edited:
arthursboy
Striker
Yep I thought that was a possibility. But that is less a reflection on myself than on them. Wonder why I use the username mirror?
Its because my posts are mirrors. If a troll reads them trolling they will see, if a philosopher reads them a philosophy he will see, if a monkey reads them monkeyish they will see, if no-one reads them nobody it must be
Sorry that sounds a little condescending. I don't actually think you are nobody. In Lak'ech Ala K'in.
If you haven't read it, I can assure you that it is quite interesting, even if it is only to read a perspective that is not your own. I find trying on different reality hats, and seeing if they fit, if not trying a new one on, is a good path to wisdom.
In Lak-ech Ala K'in Repswich. In Lak-ech.
A lazy scholar is no scholar! Although I hear what you say to an extent, and yes, if someone has an argument it should be able to be condensed, however, sometimes it turns out that some points require more words than others.
It is a wall of text that looks a lot on a forum, yet is actually only 1 A4 page - and no obligation to read the links, you know.
If you are unable to read a page, to give a proper reply, then sorry, but we operate differently. Can I recommend the Daily Star if you like short and punchy? Genuine question - have you ever read a book?
It isn't conspiracy stuff. It is all sourced, and the majority, although admittedly not all are sourced from scientific publications, I wouldn't consider any of the rest dodgy sites. If you judge things that are contrary to what an authority figure tells you then you might call it conspiracy stuff. Although I maintain disagreeing with a particular view does not make one a conspiracy theorist. Are you aware of the concept of critical thought?
If you judge things on their own merits, as a proper scholar should you wouldn't call it conspiracy stuff. I note that you regularly don't provide sources to the propaganda you project How come the double standards? Have you any sources to counter the argument.
I am an accountant for two hospitals. If you are dubious of this claim, I am happy to accept a private convo to prove it, yet I would rather not post too much onto the web. I also come from a medical family
Not connected but I read this the other day, and thought it might amuse you, although I'll be honest I find it hard to imagine you amused:
On The Psychology Of The Conspiracy Denier
Tim Foyle Why is it that otherwise perfectly intelligent, thoughtful and rationally minded people baulk at the suggestion that sociopaths are conspiring to manipulate and deceive them? And why will…
You must realise that it’s a wall of text and mainly waffle, I’m open minded but sceptical of your info.
Super Mario
Central Defender
Mirror seems more likely to be a 'mirror' account for someone we know - never posted about anything but COVID.
