This litte girl on the Isle of Bute



BigPete said:
Already has been, saying that he shouldn’t be killed and should learn from it while he’s locked up.... :rolleyes:

No way he can be rehabilitated harvest his organs for donors and finish him off, save the tax payers money and may save a life.
Click to expand...
And there’s already been a donor recipient (me) on this thread saying that dialysis is a preferable option over receiving the organs of a piece of shit like this.
 
jedi_toaster said:
And there’s already been a donor recipient (me) on this thread saying that dialysis is a preferable option over receiving the organs of a piece of shit like this.
Click to expand...
Just because you would refuse doesn't mean others would, do you think somebody which it was a matter of life or death would?

You don't speak on behalf of everyone I'm afraid, neither do I but I would imagine if it was never see your family again or take the donation lots would take the donation.
 
BigPete said:
Just because you would refuse doesn't mean others would, do you think somebody which it was a matter of life or death would?

You don't speak on behalf of everyone I'm afraid, neither do I but I would imagine if it was never see your family again or take the donation lots would take the donation.
Click to expand...

Harvesting the organs of criminals. Jesus. People like you should be kept away from society
 
Frijj said:
Harvesting the organs of criminals. Jesus. People like you should be kept away from society
Click to expand...

Not really we would advance a lot faster if had less do-gooders saying what you can and can't do.

Luckily people like you are kept away from society as spend majority of their time inside on the internet.
 
It was a horrendous trial for everyone involved apart from the accused who had a great time by all accounts
So here is the thing...at what point in the trial process do you think the murder's lawyer/advocate realised it was all a complete pack of lies (and remembered he had a wider duty)
 
BigPete said:
Just because you would refuse doesn't mean others would, do you think somebody which it was a matter of life or death would?

You don't speak on behalf of everyone I'm afraid, neither do I but I would imagine if it was never see your family again or take the donation lots would take the donation.
Click to expand...
I certainly don’t speak for everyone, no. But in my 21 years as a transplant patient I’ve been around enough recipients and people requiring transplants to comment from an informed position. I think you underestimate the gravity of having a part of someone else’s body put into your body. It’s a pretty emotional and affecting procedure, and it’s absolutely unconscionable to add in the possibility of your donor organ having been part of the life force that performed such heinous acts.
 
ivanthereasonable said:
The benefits of this are obvious. But it will never happen. As long as the god squad have power in this country. We could at least draw blood from them.
Click to expand...
Not sure the god squad are culpable for a refusal to carry out highly ethically dubious practices. I'm not in the least religious and am often critical of organised religion but I can't blame them for the fact we don't regard prisoners as spare parts!
 
BigPete said:
Not really we would advance a lot faster if had less do-gooders saying what you can and can't do.

Luckily people like you are kept away from society as spend majority of their time inside on the internet.
Click to expand...
Yeah, fuck these do-gooders. Doing good everywhere. Doing good like being transplant doctors and stuff.

Problem with your suggested model is that we’d need loads of medical professionals with no morals, which unfortunately negates every one I’ve ever met. Do-gooders to a man/woman, in my experience.

‘Do no harm’. How do you square the Hippocratic oath with the removal of a criminal’s organs, leading to their death?
 
jedi_toaster said:
Yeah, fuck these do-gooders. Doing good everywhere. Doing good like being transplant doctors and stuff.

Problem with your suggested model is that we’d need loads of medical professionals with no morals, which unfortunately negates every one I’ve ever met. Do-gooders to a man/woman, in my experience.

‘Do no harm’. How do you square the Hippocratic oath with the removal of a criminal’s organs, leading to their death?
Click to expand...

They would be on death row already for their crimes anyway.
 

Back
Top