The Stone Roses


Was most of their output just filler? Not that familiar with them outside the likes of Fools Gold and She Bangs the Drums.

Around an hour ago I requested my smart home device to shuffle songs by them. Have to say, amongst a few hits there’s mainly a lot of forgettable garbage in there.

Does it work better if you listen to it in the album order? Because I just don’t get most of it at the minute.
 
I’m totally with you. I don’t get it.

I don’t like Oasis, but I see why others do.

I genuinely don’t think the Roses have any good songs

Aye, I’m not Oasis’ biggest fan but I can completely see the appeal.

I’m actually warming to them more with age as well which is deeply concerning :lol:
 
Are you suggesting this might not go down well on here or something there m8?
Fuck man, even someone as new on here as me knows that any music thread about any band is likely to end up in hurt feelings, bans, and unsolicited PMs. And that's on the "positives" side of results.
 
The Stone Roses is one of the best albums by any band at any time.
There is no hope for you.

Well that is nonsense but I think the point he was making was that they are mostly filler and given the second coming is garbage I’d have to agree.
 
Fuck man, even someone as new on here as me knows that any music thread about any band is likely to end up in hurt feelings, bans, and unsolicited PMs. And that's on the "positives" side of results.

I’m hoping we can all be very reasonable here. I’ve offered an olive branch in that they did write some very good songs.

Well that is nonsense but I think the point he was making was that they are mostly filler and given the second coming is garbage I’d have to agree.

I think what I’m hearing is some very good songs from the first album shuffled in with all the shite that people are saying came after.
 
Last edited:

Back
Top