The Snoopers Charter

Status
Not open for further replies.


The baton of chief protector of the Westminster ring is a title that gets passed on to pm after pm....apparently.

Just in case anybody doesn't know....as a junior politician. May and her husband were financially involved with P.I.E (pedophile information exchange) to decriminalise child porn which didn't involve child abuse (wtf?), lower the age of consent for kids. Whilst Home Secretary, she shut down 2 hardcore investigations into pedophile rings, especially the ones involving her mates in Westminster. So I don't say it lightly, she is a pedophile sympathiser at best, active participant at worst.

And we have her as defacto prime minister and wants us to elect her again. Words fail me.

I wonder why no one ever pulls her up on her extremist pedophile views?

[QUOTE="Cowvahlo, post: 25524732,
You know the score about this mate, wish we could talk about it openly but I fear bannings would take place[/QUOTE]

I'll take one for the team marra. People need to know this shit. Its not a conspiracy theory but conspiracy fact.
 
Last edited:
Just in case anybody doesn't know....as a junior politician. May and her husband were financially involved with P.I.E (pedophile information exchange) to decriminalise child porn which didn't involve child abuse (wtf?), lower the age of consent for kids. Whilst Home Secretary, she shut down 2 hardcore investigations into pedophile rings, especially the ones involving her mates in Westminster. So I don't say it lightly, she is a pedophile sympathiser at best, active participant at worst.

And we have her as defacto prime minister and wants us to elect her again. Words fail me.

I wonder why no one ever pulls her up on her extremist pedophile views?
Very well put as usual mate.

As you say, why this doesn't get mainstream media attention is ridiculous....but hang on, the papers aren't going to blow the kid on her and her cronies, those stories will squashed by those that also sympathise.

The whole PIE thing is disgusting
 
there's a spy amung us :p:D well they'll know i can't spell

Organisations including the Food Standards Agency and the Department for Work and Pensions will be able to see UK citizens’ entire internet browsing history within weeks.

The Investigatory Powers Bill, which was all but passed into law this week, forces internet providers to keep a full list of internet connection records (ICRs) for a year and to make them available to the Government if asked.

The full list of agencies that can now ask for UK citizens’ browsing history, which is laid out in Schedule 4 of the Bill and was collected by Chris Yiu, is below:

  • Metropolitan Police Service
  • City of London Police
  • Police forces maintained under section 2 of the Police Act 1996
  • Police Service of Scotland
  • Police Service of Northern Ireland
  • British Transport Police
  • Ministry of Defence Police
  • Royal Navy Police
  • Royal Military Police
  • Royal Air Force Police
  • Security Service
  • Secret Intelligence Service
  • GCHQ
  • Ministry of Defence
  • Department of Health
  • Home Office
  • Ministry of Justice
  • National Crime Agency
  • HM Revenue & Customs
  • Department for Transport
  • Department for Work and Pensions
  • NHS trusts and foundation trusts in England that provide ambulance services
  • Common Services Agency for the Scottish Health Service
  • Competition and Markets Authority
  • Criminal Cases Review Commission
  • Department for Communities in Northern Ireland
  • Department for the Economy in Northern Ireland
  • Department of Justice in Northern Ireland
  • Financial Conduct Authority
  • Fire and rescue authorities under the Fire and Rescue Services Act 2004
  • Food Standards Agency
  • Food Standards Scotland
  • Gambling Commission
  • Gangmasters and Labour Abuse Authority
  • Health and Safety Executive
  • Independent Police Complaints Commissioner
  • Information Commissioner
  • NHS Business Services Authority
  • Northern Ireland Ambulance Service Health and Social Care Trust
  • Northern Ireland Fire and Rescue Service Board
  • Northern Ireland Health and Social Care Regional Business Services Organisation
  • Office of Communications
  • Office of the Police Ombudsman for Northern Ireland
  • Police Investigations and Review Commissioner
  • Scottish Ambulance Service Board
  • Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission
  • Serious Fraud Office
  • Welsh Ambulance Services National Health Service Trust
http://www.independent.co.uk/life-s...wsing-history-what-does-it-mean-a7436251.html
 
there's a spy amung us :p:D well they'll know i can't spell

Organisations including the Food Standards Agency and the Department for Work and Pensions will be able to see UK citizens’ entire internet browsing history within weeks.

The Investigatory Powers Bill, which was all but passed into law this week, forces internet providers to keep a full list of internet connection records (ICRs) for a year and to make them available to the Government if asked.

The full list of agencies that can now ask for UK citizens’ browsing history, which is laid out in Schedule 4 of the Bill and was collected by Chris Yiu, is below:

  • Metropolitan Police Service
  • City of London Police
  • Police forces maintained under section 2 of the Police Act 1996
  • Police Service of Scotland
  • Police Service of Northern Ireland
  • British Transport Police
  • Ministry of Defence Police
  • Royal Navy Police
  • Royal Military Police
  • Royal Air Force Police
  • Security Service
  • Secret Intelligence Service
  • GCHQ
  • Ministry of Defence
  • Department of Health
  • Home Office
  • Ministry of Justice
  • National Crime Agency
  • HM Revenue & Customs
  • Department for Transport
  • Department for Work and Pensions
  • NHS trusts and foundation trusts in England that provide ambulance services
  • Common Services Agency for the Scottish Health Service
  • Competition and Markets Authority
  • Criminal Cases Review Commission
  • Department for Communities in Northern Ireland
  • Department for the Economy in Northern Ireland
  • Department of Justice in Northern Ireland
  • Financial Conduct Authority
  • Fire and rescue authorities under the Fire and Rescue Services Act 2004
  • Food Standards Agency
  • Food Standards Scotland
  • Gambling Commission
  • Gangmasters and Labour Abuse Authority
  • Health and Safety Executive
  • Independent Police Complaints Commissioner
  • Information Commissioner
  • NHS Business Services Authority
  • Northern Ireland Ambulance Service Health and Social Care Trust
  • Northern Ireland Fire and Rescue Service Board
  • Northern Ireland Health and Social Care Regional Business Services Organisation
  • Office of Communications
  • Office of the Police Ombudsman for Northern Ireland
  • Police Investigations and Review Commissioner
  • Scottish Ambulance Service Board
  • Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission
  • Serious Fraud Office
  • Welsh Ambulance Services National Health Service Trust
http://www.independent.co.uk/life-s...wsing-history-what-does-it-mean-a7436251.html

Bill will get passed nee bother now.

I dunno about anyone else but something in this snooping charter doesn't sit right with me. I'm not into this "if you not got owt to hide" bullshit.
 
Bill will get passed nee bother now.

I dunno about anyone else but something in this snooping charter doesn't sit right with me. I'm not into this "if you not got owt to hide" bullshit.

must have got nowt to hide otherwise there'd be a knock at door :D

I'm just not safe with the goverment knowing , as its what they doing with that data. be ads to brainwash you to voting for them etc.
 
It's not about checking my emails to see who I've been messaging, it's about data collection so the propaganda that's spouted on a daily basis can be manipulated to suit the mood of the country.
If this was purely about stopping terrorism why haven't we heard about its success? Why aren't we hearing of foiled plots on a regular basis?


f***ing predictive text man!!!!:oops::lol:

I think the powers to check calls, messages, etc were already there mate

There has been 14 foiled plots over recent years. Lets assume each attack had same effect manchester did. Thats around 300 lives saved.
I dont understand why people are bothered about it. You think they are going to rifle through regular joe publics email account and see what his mrs has ordered from very?
The raids that have come following the attack may have come from information from methods used as part of the charter. Therefore bringing to justice people who knew and assisted in the attack. People for me who could have potential to commit similar attacks.

Terror watch list subjects for me should be treat like we treat registered sex offenders. They are given visits by police on a regular basis, their offending assessed and they must notify address changes etc and sign on. However, police would need money to do this. PCSOs are managing medium and low RSOs at the moment and could be utilised similarly for such tasks including house searches with assistance from cops
 
Nothing can work 100% of the time but what about the other 14 conspiracies it may have stopped.
I will happily give up a slice of my freedoms if it helps to prevent 8yr old kids being slaughtered.
Why should we give up anymore of our freedoms than we already have?! They know exactly who these animals are and they have done for quite some time. They've just done nothing about it.

Btw, if you willingly choose to become little more than a prisoner in your own country, the child murdering scumbags have won.

I thought the snoopers charter was stopped by the EU who ruled the indiscriminate collection of data to be against rules back in December - http://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...y-powers-act-emails-david-davis-a7488041.html

If it hasn't been brought in, I don't think they can be held accountable for it.
In fairness, the 'snoopers charter' wouldn't have stopped this attack. As above, my point is, they already have shed loads of intelligence on these sick fucks using whatever methods they currently use but they haven't acted on it.

More intelligence which would also impinge on the civil liberties of ordinary law abiding citizens wouldn't change that. This is more a question of inaction than intelligence gathering.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top