The Queen Is A Nazi Lizard


Status
Not open for further replies.
I wonder if that affair changed history. Had her Dad stayed on the throne we may have had closer links with the Riech.
 
It's interesting to note that I read that Douglas Hurd , among others, met on friendly terms with Saddam Hussein in the days when we were happy to sell him arms. However a search for the photos of them together turns up no results. So either nobody took photos or they have mysteriously vanished.

Seem to show up in google image search me me, if I search for "douglas hurd saddam hussein" then click images in google.
Lots of things are disapearing from search engines though, google has to comply with government/police requests to remove things from the search engine and they are not allowed to tell you what has been removed.
Mind you the bbc did a good thing (and maybe in some cases a bad thing, it all depends on why they were removed..), they published a full list of pages that the courts have forced google to remove from their search engine results

http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/internet/entries/1d765aa8-600b-4f32-b110-d02fbf7fd379

Quite the opposite, the fact the queen herself is not above the purview of a free press shows the inherent virtue of the status quo, if you have liberal principles at heart.

Not for long though, once the bill to stop anyone publishing anything that undermines democracy etc is in place then the sun would not have been able to publish that most likely.
The queen is a big part of the governmental/legislative/democratic process, the government could easily argue that an article like that would undermine the system and could put a block in it ever seeing the light of day.

Have you never done a Nazi salute?

Have you ever posed for a photograph doing a nazi salute, and kept the photo in the family archives for decades?

She was 7. As if she had any clue.

The older ones did, especially the fella who was briefly the king of this country (and would have remained so if he had not chosen to step down). He, was a strong supporter of the nazi's until well up into the 1970's decades after the full truth was out.
Says an awful lot about the royal family, if the previous KING was a supporter of the nazis for decades after the war, and he was teaching the young-uns nazi salutes... What else were they taught from a young age.
Stuff you are taught at a young age can stay with you for life.

She was 7.
I think it is disgusting given her service to her country to make such slanderous and stupid comments.

What service to her country?
She does a few appearances, waves a bit, meets and greets a few people.
She did a posed photo during the war.
She fails to read any legislation, just rubber stamps it, her job is as final safeguard for her subjects but she does not give a flying furk about them and will happily sign anything put in front of her no matter what damage it will do to her subjects or the country.

How has she served this country?

By being wheeled about in luxury to wave and be good for tourism?

She has led a privileged life. And the only thing that has separated her from the other loons who preceded her, is that she had the common sense to keep her gob shut minimise controversy.

Charlie boy will be incapable of that when he gets his hands on the royal hat. Then people will begin to realise how worthless they are.

He never will.

I happen to be a republican but any fool can see the Queen is an incredible monarch. Your political views should be strong enough to withstand the truth.
Is that not the problem, its fools that see the Queen as an incredible monarch.

She still works pretty hard for someone who is nearly 90. She does a lot of work including answering her correspondence, going on visits to various places and having meetings with parliament. It's a big workload considering most other Grandma's are probably sitting watching Countdown with a cup of tea a nice bit of battenburg.

No way does she actually do that, she has minions to do that.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Does anyone else else feel their skin crawl watching the Queen Mum (God Bless her, salt of the Earth and advocate for the bombed out poor of the East End) laughingly encouraging her children to make a Fascist salute in 1933? By 1933 Hitler's ambitions were widely known, 17m Germans had voted for him as leader of the NSDP and he was the new Chancllor of the Weimar Republic. Plenty there for her to be happy about. The young children on the other hand are simply that: innocent children.

Its worse than that, the Royals are in a position where they are VERY well advised on all things, so when normal people would have a good idea what was going on , the Royals would know the inside story, knowing far more than the public would.
So they had zero excuse to even contemplate a course of action like this unless of course they supported the nazi's, which of course he did, and continued to do even after the holocaust.

I dare say if a mainstream political party of left or right was trying to abolish you, you'd probably support the alternative, warts and all.

What, your saying if you were going to lose your job/title (but you would still be rich and well looked after for the rest of your life) you would support the nazis?
 
Seem to show up in google image search me me, if I search for "douglas hurd saddam hussein" then click images in google.
Lots of things are disapearing from search engines though, google has to comply with government/police requests to remove things from the search engine and they are not allowed to tell you what has been removed.
Mind you the bbc did a good thing (and maybe in some cases a bad thing, it all depends on why they were removed..), they published a full list of pages that the courts have forced google to remove from their search engine results

http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/internet/entries/1d765aa8-600b-4f32-b110-d02fbf7fd379

There are links to Saddam Hussein/Douglas Hurd because Hurd was opposed to the Iraq War but not, as far as I could see, photos. After reading the John Pilger article about it I was interested to see if there were any.
This bit here mentions the photos https://books.google.co.uk/books?id...onepage&q=douglas hurd saddam hussein&f=false
 
What has surprised me most about this, is that this is clearly directed at embarrassing the Queen. All of the others in the film are dead, Edward was always known as a Nazi sympathiser, so this is geared at harming the Queen. Why? What piece of shit decided to put this into the public domain and what did they want to gain from it?

I think the Sun should be compelled to reveal who gave them this film and what they received in exchange for it. Transparency and accountability, remember?

If its clearly directed at 'embarrassing the queen' then why is the person that put this into the public domain a piece of shit.
The Queen should be above reproach, this is not some parking ticket her chauffer got, this is a previous king of England teaching the Queen how to do a Nazi salute, and you can bet a lot more than that was taught to her.

I would love to know why. A couple of kids doing Nazi salutes in the 1930s long before it was generally known just what antics they were getting up to in Germsny.

The Royal's knew what was going on. In depth.

It's a PR error, but if you shine a light on anyone long enough, mistakes occur. They are human, its part of the appeal. It's probably the single biggest advantage monarchy has over a polished politician as a head of state. People love them as much for their mistakes as their virtue

Like the past king who is in the photo, nazi supporter then, and stayed one up till the 70's.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I don't really give a shit to be fair, she was 7, she'll not be doing that these days unless she's reenacting Mary Poppins' goal celebrations or the likes :neutral:

She drove army vehicles during WW2 I think, deffo a double agent she tried to run over thousands of Allied troops.

What is worse is how her mam and dad would wander around London after the heavy air raids to take the piss out of the common cockernees who'd just been made homeless and to ramp up the humiliation they'd show them photos of all of their Royal residences that were paid for by taxpayers.
 
You may think everything is about you but I was speaking generally. I am being specific when I call you an egregiously stupid waste of time.

Got the thesaurus out again pet? It doesn't make you any more intelligent you know.

So if you were speaking generally, why did you reply to my post with this garbage?
She was 7.
I think it is disgusting given her service to her country to make such slanderous and stupid comments.

So who exactly were you accusing of making slanderous and stupid comments?
 
So what exactly was happening at that time? The Nazis didn't get into power until July 1932. In April 1933 the first serious restrictions on Jews began when the population were urged to boycott Jewish businesses and attempts were made to purge Jews from the professions.

Now we don't know exactly when this film was shot but dates of 1933/4 have been suggested. At the earliest date it could simply be a case of mocking the salute rather than sympathising with it. The film needs to be accurately dated, I believe, before we can say anything about the thoughts of the adults.

In 1930 Nazi storm troopers dressed in civilian clothes celebrated their electoral victory by smashing the windows of Jewish shops, restaurants and department stores, an indication of things to come...
Remember the Royals were, and probably still are sometimes, better informed than the public on internation affairs.
 
Silly question here, but has the queen stepped forward and said, publicly, something like this...

Hang on, I was 7, I was a kid, I was playing and doing what I was told.
I am appalled that the king fella in the photo was, and remained for decades a nazi sympathiser, but I denounce the nazi party and all that it stands for.
I am sorry for any offence caused, non was meant.

Or did the palace just put out a statement screaming and crying that the photo should not have been shown?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top