The Pompey pel that wasn’t given


Status
Not open for further replies.
I honestly don't know how you can say that when it's clear that the spin of the ball changes. The fact Flanagan actually 'mishits' the ball as the Portsmouth player toe pokes it forward is also a clue. I can't even see how you think Flanagan gets it first and then the Portsmouth lad after as he's nowhere near once Flanagan toe slices it away.

Though if you've been supping alcohol and watching this on a Nokia 3310 then I can see why ;)

Logon or register to see this image

@dangermows no fuucking pen end of
 
I honestly don't know how you can say that when it's clear that the spin of the ball changes. The fact Flanagan actually 'mishits' the ball as the Portsmouth player toe pokes it forward is also a clue. I can't even see how you think Flanagan gets it first and then the Portsmouth lad after as he's nowhere near once Flanagan toe slices it away.

Though if you've been supping alcohol and watching this on a Nokia 3310 then I can see why ;)

Logon or register to see this image
I honestly don't know how you can say that when it's clear that the spin of the ball changes. The fact Flanagan actually 'mishits' the ball as the Portsmouth player toe pokes it forward is also a clue. I can't even see how you think Flanagan gets it first and then the Portsmouth lad after as he's nowhere near once Flanagan toe slices it away.

Though if you've been supping alcohol and watching this on a Nokia 3310 then I can see why ;)

Logon or register to see this image
Never a penalty. Flanagan got the ball first. The Pompey player never touched it. You’re having a laugh!
 
Last edited:
You need to go to specsavers mate!
Perfect 20/20 vision my end and it's clear as owt who got the 1st touch. I'm leaving this thread now as it's a pointless debate as it's the 2nd Billy I've replied to who I think must be watching the video on a Nokia 3310 :lol:
 
The Pompey player clearly gets a toe to the ball before Flanagan clears it - which is why it gets spooned sideways. Have a look at post 140.
No he didn't, if he got ball first it would have gone towards the goal instead of towards the touchline,
anyway why upset a fellow mackem with debatable shit, when he's enjoying a well earned night of victory.
In the grand scheme of things the ref's decision is final so if you are a mackem leave it be.If not go forth and
multiply.
 
if he got ball first it would have gone towards the goal instead of towards the touchline
Well, no, and that's a non-sequitur. The Portsmouth player gets a slight touch to the ball just as Flanagan clears it - which is why Flanagan slices it sideways. It's as clear as day on post 140.

It doesn't matter, we won and deservedly so. Portsmouth had 0 shots on target, at home, against a team with CM at RB, a RB (who is really a midfielder) at CB, and our 2nd choice LB playing. We've had Gooch, Stewart, Flanagan, Hume, Bailey Wright and Jordan Willis unavailable, and several of those are now coming back into the squad (or close to).

I'd say we are pretty much guaranteed playoffs minimum at this point, but we are the in form team in the league and the way we're going, we'll end up in the top 2.
 
Well, no, and that's a non-sequitur. The Portsmouth player gets a slight touch to the ball just as Flanagan clears it - which is why Flanagan slices it sideways. It's as clear as day on post 140.

It doesn't matter, we won and deservedly so. Portsmouth had 0 shots on target, at home, against a team with CM at RB, a RB (who is really a midfielder) at CB, and our 2nd choice LB playing. We've had Gooch, Stewart, Flanagan, Hume, Bailey Wright and Jordan Willis unavailable, and several of those are now coming back into the squad (or close to).

I'd say we are pretty much guaranteed playoffs minimum at this point, but we are the in form team in the league and the way we're going, we'll end up in the top 2.
Okay, So saying fancy words doesn't mean anything, it's the ref's decision end of.My opinion and yours are different but we are both mackems I hope.
So agree to differ and all's well that ends well, have a great evening like me. Cheers hic 😉 🤣 🤣
 
Had there been VAR it still wouldn't have been given. The ball was won before the tackle. Only just though. It was a good call by the ref, especially in this league.
 
That isn't the rule though. You can get the ball before the man, it can be still be a foul.

True. But I thought it was only if the tackle was reckless? (hard to define). I don't think it was a pen but had we been in Portsmouth'shoes we'd probably have a slightly different opinion.
 
Not a pen, plays the ball and catches the man after because the opponent takes himself into the path of the strike. Bunch of drama queens in he studio, including SKP
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top