D
Deleted member 31333
Guest
Surely that was more of a foul than the states foul if contact = a foul
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What the fuck are you watching the match on?Hoy, the ref for the second penalty said that penalty needed moving and it was less off tbe
f***ing yes, the first was that badly off the spot (fuck ya @MackemX) the 2nd wasnt half as bad
Careful, this is what apologists for Cameroon are saying about VARNever have been one for conspiracy theories....but dear god that penalty decision was beyond dodgy.
You have clearly edited them photos, thus i am rightWhat the fuck are you watching the match on?The 1st penna position was covering more white than the 2nd which barely touched the edge of the spot.
The 1st penna position is the 1st image with the 2nd below
Logon or register to see this image
Logon or register to see this image
Careful, this is what apologists for Cameroon are saying about VAR![]()
Ever tried Specsavers, mateWhat the fuck are you watching the match on?The 1st penna position was covering more white than the 2nd which barely touched the edge of the spot.
The 1st penna position is the 1st image with the 2nd below
Logon or register to see this image
Logon or register to see this image
Careful, this is what apologists for Cameroon are saying about VAR![]()
I thought the whole point of VAR was to stop controversial games and people saying things like “they’ve been robbed” or “that should have definitely been a red, the ref is rubbish”.
But the last two games have shown us that the introduction of VaR hasn’t stopped any of that at all. In fact, it’s amazingly managed to make things worse because people expect not to be robbed even more now.
It’s quite an achievement.
Taking out a player in full flight down the wing like that would likely be a yellow card, which is all the ref would have seen. The elbow turns it into red. The ref saw the foul, didn't see the use of the elbow. Ok?A basic foul is not a yellow card offence (unless it is deemed to be unsporting behaviour or there has been a succession of them & the yellow card is produced for persistent misconduct).
Again how could the ref have awarded the foul if she was blind sided & didnt see it, as you originally suggested?
Spot on.I thought the whole point of VAR was to stop controversial games and people saying things like “they’ve been robbed” or “that should have definitely been a red, the ref is rubbish”.
But the last two games have shown us that the introduction of VaR hasn’t stopped any of that at all. In fact, it’s amazingly managed to make things worse because people expect not to be robbed even more now.
It’s quite an achievement.
If FIFA can justify the use of var for discerning that someone’s door is 5 or 6 mms away from where it should be then they’re surely able to for deliberate elbows to the head and stamping on Achilles heels. If not then they’re not for for purpose.Taking out a player in full flight down the wing like that would likely be a yellow card, which is all the ref would have seen. The elbow turns it into red. The ref saw the foul, didn't see the use of the elbow. Ok?
I thought var would be a once a month usage on average per team, on this basis its 4 var a halfIf FIFA can justify the use of var for discerning that someone’s door is 5 or 6 mms away from where it should be then they’re surely able to for deliberate elbows to the head and stamping on Achilles heels. If not then they’re not for for purpose.
I thought the whole point of VAR was to stop controversial games and people saying things like “they’ve been robbed” or “that should have definitely been a red, the ref is rubbish”.
But the last two games have shown us that the introduction of VaR hasn’t stopped any of that at all. In fact, it’s amazingly managed to make things worse because people expect not to be robbed even more now.
It’s quite an achievement.
Door? Supposed to be foot and fit ffs!If FIFA can justify the use of var for discerning that someone’s door is 5 or 6 mms away from where it should be then they’re surely able to for deliberate elbows to the head and stamping on Achilles heels. If not then they’re not for for purpose.